I'm sorry, but I'm not sure what you are referring to by the "it" in, "Yeah, I get that it was just an exaggeration."
Are you referring to the article above? Because "full of" is a rather common expression/idiom that would not be considered an exaggeration in other examples I gave.
You seem to be trying to attach a lot of baggage not relevant to the article or any previously made comment. This can look a lot like exaggeration of scope and as a way to try to get people "all angry."
Again, noting that white supremacy is present and increasing activity is not a left vs. right issue for any reasonable bounds of the political spectrum. Trying to turn it into a political left vs right issue is a disservice to which ever one is trying to bolster.
if you cannot see the wellspring of klan and nazi visibility since the election, you're just being willfully ignorant. or perhaps you never switch your tv from fox news or your radio from rush. the fact that these nazis and klan turds are the first to point out that they feel vindicated and emboldened by trump has also apparently escaped you. sad.
When someone says, "That article was full of spelling mistakes," do they mean that the article had 100% of the words misspelled? If someone says, "That house is full of termites," do they mean it is 100% full of termites and not a single additional one will fit?
Have you honestly never seen the expression "full of" used to mean "a lot" or "too many?" If not, and you do realize there are other ways that expression can be interpreted, why chose an interpretation that makes less sense? That seems awfully risky of looking hypocritical when complaining about others pretending to misread things.
Noting that white supremacists still exist in the US and that their activity has experienced a recent uptick is not partisan. With family in towns that still have KKK meets and rallies, I've heard plenty from people on both sides of the political spectrum about the problems the supremacists' antics cause. If you view opposing them or even acknowledging their existence is "political mudslinging", you have bigger problems than just deciding what website to visit for random links.
Just saw an Eons video that pointed out the lack of “wee little beasties” during the Carboniferous age. Trees that fell down were not decomposed and eventually turned into coal.
Reminds me of the guy who was on the old SteveAllen show that ate just about anything. If memory serves me, one time Steve gave him a set of keys and he ate them. Steve did many funny bits. The "Answer Man" which was probably an old vaudeville act was an earlier version of Carson's Carnac. Steve pretty much steered away from any political topics. Wish the so-called comics of today would do the same and just be funny.
Even when warnings are understandable and explicit, they are still ignored. In an area of Japan, there are stones inscribed with warnings that a tsunami was able to reach the level of the stone markers. Future generations were warned not to build their houses below the level of the stones.
These warning stones were readable by even modern Japanese, and described a type of disaster that all Japanese are familiar with. And yet, in some places, residential buildings were placed too close to the water, with disastrous results during the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami.
Radioactive cats and 'nuclear priesthoods' don't stand a chance.
Are you referring to the article above? Because "full of" is a rather common expression/idiom that would not be considered an exaggeration in other examples I gave.
You seem to be trying to attach a lot of baggage not relevant to the article or any previously made comment. This can look a lot like exaggeration of scope and as a way to try to get people "all angry."
Again, noting that white supremacy is present and increasing activity is not a left vs. right issue for any reasonable bounds of the political spectrum. Trying to turn it into a political left vs right issue is a disservice to which ever one is trying to bolster.
Have you honestly never seen the expression "full of" used to mean "a lot" or "too many?" If not, and you do realize there are other ways that expression can be interpreted, why chose an interpretation that makes less sense? That seems awfully risky of looking hypocritical when complaining about others pretending to misread things.
Steve did many funny bits. The "Answer Man" which was probably an old vaudeville act was an earlier version of Carson's Carnac. Steve pretty much steered away from any political topics. Wish the so-called comics of today would do the same and just be funny.
In an area of Japan, there are stones inscribed with warnings that a tsunami was able to reach the level of the stone markers. Future generations were warned not to build their houses below the level of the stones.
These warning stones were readable by even modern Japanese, and described a type of disaster that all Japanese are familiar with. And yet, in some places, residential buildings were placed too close to the water, with disastrous results during the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami.
Radioactive cats and 'nuclear priesthoods' don't stand a chance.