Gus Grissom had a really distinctive face. Knew they were Mercury/Gemini astronauts from his face :D

Everyone can be right depending on your point of view.

If it moves, kill it. If it breathes kill it. If its new to science kill it and photograph it from as far away as possible.

Then shoot the camera and some roadsigns you noticed on the way over...

"Pa whats that big bright ball in the sky?"

"KILL IT"

Amazing photo...shame about the comments.Damn I didnt know those birds were so damn big!

And cue all the anti-british posts :\

I dont get irritated by Americanisms unless its in offical spiel ie Bushisms. They irritate the hell out of me.

I'm always using Americanisms. My mother lived in New York in the fifties gor a couple of years but has been back in the UK for 50 years and she still says "in back of".

And now the "soviets" will have the lead once again - as the US will no longer have a manned launcher.

Welcome to 1960. :(

So...victory goes to the Russians who still, after all they have been through, are able to put a man in orbit.

What the blue blazes in hell is America doing...? /boggle

Great an interesting photo with no information. The worst kind of photo.

Those are varicose veins as far as I can tell and have nothing to do with cycling?

This is old news. Think I saw this posted two or three years ago

Not one of these is even close to the definition of proof.

That prison one was hilarious. He even manages to move that bit of hanging cloth to the left as he runs up to the camera covered in a black sheet.

All the images are overexposures or double negatives.

The recordings are easily faked.

The car lot one was classic. I cannot believe anyone thought that was actually a real ghost.

Technology at the moment means ghosts will never be proven as it is just far too easy to fake them.

Isnt that pic of the Moon & Earth from New Horizons not Voyager?

AFAIK Voyager cameras werent deployed that early in the mission

Spelling fail.

This isnt even close to the shuttle. Its unmanned for starters, doesnt land like a plane, is smaller and unmanned. Did I say its unmanned?

This is just a reusable version of the reliable cargo ferries the Russians have used for years to the ISS. Old news.

It's 40 years before we see it. If it takes 40 years to develop ONE aircraft then it isnt innovation, its being slack, inefficient and wasteful.

Perhaps designing a similar aircraft thats got a development cycle that isnt a total joke would be kind of more worth the effort?

Its their life...seems alien to me to deliberately go out of your way to look ugly though.

Anyone remember Otto Sump's ugly craze in 2000ad from like 1980 or something? Well, here it is...

Ryan - The crux of the matter is that this is a question that people actually think needs to be asked. "Should we teach what is admittedly still a theory but with overwhelming evidence literally everywhere that its correct - in a *school*".

Its an absurd question and one that belongs in dark ages England where ignorance was the only thing that kept you from being burnt at the stake or worse.

Theology has nothing to do with it. Ignorance has everything to do with it.