ManOrMonster's Comments
"If *nobody* could carry a gun with them, this would not have happened!"
Well, since it's impossible to stop everyone from carrying guns, Jerse's solution is more realistic.
Well, since it's impossible to stop everyone from carrying guns, Jerse's solution is more realistic.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Matthew 5:33-37 (YLT) (Jesus is speaking)
33 Again, ye heard that it was said to the ancients: Thou shalt not swear falsely, but thou shalt pay to the Lord thine oaths;
34 but I -- I say to you, not to swear at all; neither by the heaven, because it is the throne of God,
35 nor by the earth, because it is His footstool, nor by Jerusalem, because it is a city of a great king,
36 nor by thy head mayest thou swear, because thou art not able one hair to make white or black;
37 but let your word be, Yes, Yes, No, No, and that which is more than these is of the evil.
-----------------------------
The OT commanded that one does not swear falsely. Jesus stated that one should not swear at all, to just let their "Yes" and "No" mean exactly that, to always tell the truth so that there is no reason to swear.
So yes, it seems ridiculous that anyone should swear on the Bible (or on anything else for that matter), because anyone who believes the Bible should know not to swear on it. Apparently Roosevelt didn't want "In God We Trust" on money, as he felt it was blasphemous. I assume he refused to swear on the Bible for the same reason.
33 Again, ye heard that it was said to the ancients: Thou shalt not swear falsely, but thou shalt pay to the Lord thine oaths;
34 but I -- I say to you, not to swear at all; neither by the heaven, because it is the throne of God,
35 nor by the earth, because it is His footstool, nor by Jerusalem, because it is a city of a great king,
36 nor by thy head mayest thou swear, because thou art not able one hair to make white or black;
37 but let your word be, Yes, Yes, No, No, and that which is more than these is of the evil.
-----------------------------
The OT commanded that one does not swear falsely. Jesus stated that one should not swear at all, to just let their "Yes" and "No" mean exactly that, to always tell the truth so that there is no reason to swear.
So yes, it seems ridiculous that anyone should swear on the Bible (or on anything else for that matter), because anyone who believes the Bible should know not to swear on it. Apparently Roosevelt didn't want "In God We Trust" on money, as he felt it was blasphemous. I assume he refused to swear on the Bible for the same reason.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Jason... learn teh Intarweb.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
What the hell are you talking about? Dave Devries does drawings, Yeon Doo Jung uses photography. I personally think it would be harder to stage these and take photos than to draw them. In any case, it's not a rip-off, it's a completely different medium.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Aaaaactuuuaaallyyyy... it's 3 × 10-24 seconds, or 1/60 of a second, or 1/50 of a second, or 0.01 seconds (which turns out to be... wait for it... 1/100 of a second). Perhaps you should fully parse a Wikipedia article before trying to correct someone next time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiffy_(time)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiffy_(time)
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
You'd have to be an idiot to believe that Mary was a virgin her whole life. The PURPOSE of marriage is so that you can have sex (and the children that go along with it). The Catholics practically worship Mary, and the only reason they teach that she stayed a virgin is so that she stays holy (like you can't be a "saint" if you have had sex... most of the apostles were not virgins, having married and produced offspring before ever following Jesus). However, if she never had sex with Joseph then she was a VERY poor wife, especially by Biblical standards, and so she wouldn't have been a very holy person anyway.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Pol x, I guarantee you that the vast majority of Americans who have heard of the Smurfs, a) only know them from an American cartoon and b) naturally assume they are an American creation. That's the truth, so get over yourself.
The only reason I knew they weren't an American creation when I was a kid was because I read the comics, and they clearly weren't American.
The only reason I knew they weren't an American creation when I was a kid was because I read the comics, and they clearly weren't American.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
There's a real woman, not like the pathetic garbage we have here in the US who have their babies murdered so they don't have to go through the inconvenience of childbirth.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Kaka said:
"My slight dyslexia..."
Dyslexia? You sub-human. Your parents should have let you die and just "tried again" for the betterment of the species.
BTW, your name suits you.
"My slight dyslexia..."
Dyslexia? You sub-human. Your parents should have let you die and just "tried again" for the betterment of the species.
BTW, your name suits you.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Yeah, Al Gore didn't just invent the Internet, he CREATED it. He crafted it with his own two hands. You should be thanking Al Gore that you're able to read Neatorama today.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Yet again we see proof that what doctors call a "persistent vegetative state" can be completely recovered from. Many people a year are murdered because a doctor told their families they cannot recover. Google Ambien and its effect on PVS patients and you'll see definitive proof that doctors don't know what the hell they're talking about. BTW, my stepmom's mother was woken from a supposed "PVS" by Ambien (something I recommended they try, since the stupid-ass doctor had never even heard of the treatment). She actually heard her doctor try to convince her husband to pull the plug while she was in the coma. I think the term itself is very misleading and should be dropped (vegetables can't overhear anything).
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Also, cell phone videos don't look like that.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Seriously though, none of these are even remotely realistic scenarios. Well, a couple of them might be somewhat realistic, but the extremely limited choices are not. And I'm a little troubled to see how many people would be willing to murder someone to save their own skin.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
What are all these idiots doing standing around on trolley tracks anyway?
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
"Screw them..."
"A violent god with violent followers, fuck em both and pass more laws against them so they shut the fuck up, let them howl in prison about their invisible creator while bubba puts a Jesus wig on them and bounces them off his happy stick..."
You're nothing but a bigot.
"Of course, the church would rather that info not be found, so those scriptures are censored/lost."
Any writings that completely contradict other scriptures weren't included in the Bible for a reason, genius. You and your new best Internet friend are living proof that any idiot can write... does this mean that any idiot's ramblings from that time period should be included in the scriptures?
"Don’t speak for all Christians with your interpretation and say the bible is against homosexuality; I know plenty of Christians who would refute that."
Leviticus 20:13 "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."
So how, exactly, do you "interpret" that?