It's interesting to see an instance of this where bad-blood wasn't involved. I honestly hadn't really thought about it, but always had assumed Dick York had had a falling out with producers. I imagine most people at the time thought that as well. If they had gotten the full story, they might have been a bit more forgiving of the swap. Kept in the dark though, they could only use their gut to determine if they could follow the show with such a drastic change of casting.
that wooden spoon one is really dependent on pan and spoon, but for the love of god DONT DO THAT EVEN IF IT DOES FIT. Adding additional weight to the furthest edge of the handle is bad news by itself, but the odds of bumping a boiling pot of whatever off your stove by adding an extra flimsy handle to the whole mix is totally not worth the.. counter mess? that the hack is trying to cure. Just put a cloth down for your spoon if getting a little of your whatever on your counter is too much for your brain to handle.
the post, above the quote, said proton instead of photon.
OT:
Unless i see it on scishow, I'm going to put this in the "Nah, probably not" pile, because Hank Green would be all up on this. Plus, photons forming molecules seems like science fiction gibberish.
I do hope it's right though, because more awesome is always nice.
these materials are certainly amazing, but their saying that Graphene Aerogel is less dense then Helium just strikes me as just... wrong. If something's less dense then air, it should float, not "practically float", and even with listed numbers, my knowledge about chemistry is sort of blowing a horn... I'm not claiming to be all knowing, I'm just saying this is a pretty simple concept - denser things sink, less dense things float.
That being said, I loves me some graphene and if that aerogel can hold 900x its own weight in oil, bring it on, that's amazing all by itself.
because Monty Python fans, as they are now, are renowned across the whole world for their sublimely cool and not at all argumentative attitude towards various bits of Monty Python minutia. :D
is it strange that even though I know this film almost by heart, I kind of really want to see this take on it?
Like, I wish there was a dead serious re-cut of Holy Grail just sitting in a vault somewhere. Don't remake it, god no, but it would be nice if while they were doing the Monty Python version, they were taking alternative cuts that played the movie out as dark and serious, in secret..
And then drop it on us 30 years later cause it would that itself would be hilarious.
If I ever make a movie, I'm going to do that. It probably would never work out because I'd be ostensibly making two movies, but the lolfactor alone would be great, and DVD sales would be through the roof (assuming of course it was even worth seeing)
Clearly they did not care for it.
OT:
Unless i see it on scishow, I'm going to put this in the "Nah, probably not" pile, because Hank Green would be all up on this. Plus, photons forming molecules seems like science fiction gibberish.
I do hope it's right though, because more awesome is always nice.
That being said, I loves me some graphene and if that aerogel can hold 900x its own weight in oil, bring it on, that's amazing all by itself.
Like, I wish there was a dead serious re-cut of Holy Grail just sitting in a vault somewhere. Don't remake it, god no, but it would be nice if while they were doing the Monty Python version, they were taking alternative cuts that played the movie out as dark and serious, in secret..
And then drop it on us 30 years later cause it would that itself would be hilarious.
If I ever make a movie, I'm going to do that. It probably would never work out because I'd be ostensibly making two movies, but the lolfactor alone would be great, and DVD sales would be through the roof (assuming of course it was even worth seeing)