I dunno... that gator looked like he knew exactly what he was getting if he nommed that melon. Something tells me this is not the first time he's has a melon lobbed at his gaping maw.
MadMolecule, Ted: I love you both. You sound like the calm nougat center in an otherwise crazy discussion. OMG KIDS IS HAVING SECKS!!!1 What else is new?
First of all, college students aren't kids. Second, they can have sex if they want to. Third, Axe didn't make them have sex. Chances are, Axe prevented more than it enabled. There's only one Axe that smells halfway decent (Kilo). Fourth, I know way more guys in monogamous relationships than I do the type to run around and get a new piece of ass every night. Fifth, if you want to blame things on ads, you've got to get started on just about every ad for Captain Morgan, Budweiser, Trojan, Levis, and just about every product which has ever used sex to sell their products (PROTIP: good luck on that one, scooter). Sixth, just because something is offensive, does not mean that it cannot be funny. It might not be funny to you, but don't just start declaring comedy fatwas every time you get sand in your vagina. See what I did there? I laughed at that, but most girls probably didn't. Doesn't mean its not funny to me, or anyone else for that matter, it just means I can laugh at something that you can't. I think that means I'm a broader person. You probably disagree. I don't care. Seventh, what was I talking about again? Step 8 - ??????? Step 9 - PROFIT!
I'm not seeing where this system loses energy... it doesn't require ANY outside power to keep going? You start it up and it goes and goes? Am I missing something?
Has anyone noticed that the girls in the windows are all models, and that there are no girls in any windows that don't represent a day of the month? It just seems like some of you are under the impression that actual students are being shown off as one night stand material.
Models are used to being objectified and used to sell sex to 14 year old boys. Its kind of in the job description.
Maybe I'm a sexist asshole, but no real people were harmed in the making of this (mildly funny) ad for a crappy product.
@bluejay: I feel your frustration. I'm sick of it too. Polling suggests that people don't like the sound of "Democrat Party" as much as "Democratic Party" so a few years ago, there was an internal push by the GOP to publicly use the term Democrat Party as much as possible.
I wonder if the people he tried to sue could file a class-action lawsuit against him for tarnishing their reputations. Most of the world would be involved.
Seriously though, I had a chance to read some of the papers he's filed when my father brought home a stack of them from the DA's office (they pass them around and all get a good laugh), and they're just as crazy as they sound. The things he sues for are amazing.
Totally fake. For one, trusting a question on Yahoo Answers is like citing wikipedia on your doctoral dissertation.
Another point, her previous question on Yahoo Answers went something like, "what are some commonly banned books? My school doesn't ban any, I'm just curious." She said that her friend went to a school where some books were banned, but that her own school had no such policy.
Also, after people online started taking this seriously, and asking where they could DONATE MONEY TO HER she disabled the ability to search her previous questions. I was going to post on BB about it and I went from one of her questions to another, and when I tried to go to the next, she'd disabled the feature that lets users see what questions she'd asked, as well as the ability to contact her, both of which were available when I started.
Just to top things off, in the question she is being praised for, she talks about not wanting to "pollute her library" with Twilight, but in one of her other questions she refers to it as one of her favorites.
Several of her questions were simply her vetting ideas for her own writings (nothing wrong with that), and some suggest that this question is simply that, no harm done. Howver, I've heard many people suggest that she open a PayPal account so that people could donate money, and I've heard other suggest that she be given a full scholarship to wherever she wants to go. I know this kind of thing pulls at the geek heartstrings, but please don't buy into it.
Maybe I'm a cynic, but I don't believe this story for a second.
First of all, college students aren't kids.
Second, they can have sex if they want to.
Third, Axe didn't make them have sex. Chances are, Axe prevented more than it enabled. There's only one Axe that smells halfway decent (Kilo).
Fourth, I know way more guys in monogamous relationships than I do the type to run around and get a new piece of ass every night.
Fifth, if you want to blame things on ads, you've got to get started on just about every ad for Captain Morgan, Budweiser, Trojan, Levis, and just about every product which has ever used sex to sell their products (PROTIP: good luck on that one, scooter).
Sixth, just because something is offensive, does not mean that it cannot be funny. It might not be funny to you, but don't just start declaring comedy fatwas every time you get sand in your vagina. See what I did there? I laughed at that, but most girls probably didn't. Doesn't mean its not funny to me, or anyone else for that matter, it just means I can laugh at something that you can't. I think that means I'm a broader person. You probably disagree. I don't care.
Seventh, what was I talking about again?
Step 8 - ???????
Step 9 - PROFIT!
Models are used to being objectified and used to sell sex to 14 year old boys. Its kind of in the job description.
Maybe I'm a sexist asshole, but no real people were harmed in the making of this (mildly funny) ad for a crappy product.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(phrase)
Seriously though, I had a chance to read some of the papers he's filed when my father brought home a stack of them from the DA's office (they pass them around and all get a good laugh), and they're just as crazy as they sound. The things he sues for are amazing.
Another point, her previous question on Yahoo Answers went something like, "what are some commonly banned books? My school doesn't ban any, I'm just curious." She said that her friend went to a school where some books were banned, but that her own school had no such policy.
Also, after people online started taking this seriously, and asking where they could DONATE MONEY TO HER she disabled the ability to search her previous questions. I was going to post on BB about it and I went from one of her questions to another, and when I tried to go to the next, she'd disabled the feature that lets users see what questions she'd asked, as well as the ability to contact her, both of which were available when I started.
Just to top things off, in the question she is being praised for, she talks about not wanting to "pollute her library" with Twilight, but in one of her other questions she refers to it as one of her favorites.
Several of her questions were simply her vetting ideas for her own writings (nothing wrong with that), and some suggest that this question is simply that, no harm done. Howver, I've heard many people suggest that she open a PayPal account so that people could donate money, and I've heard other suggest that she be given a full scholarship to wherever she wants to go. I know this kind of thing pulls at the geek heartstrings, but please don't buy into it.
Maybe I'm a cynic, but I don't believe this story for a second.
An image of the comments can be found at http://www.woosk.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/wolf-shirt.jpg
I believe this is the one that started the trend.