Miss Cellania's Liked Comments

If you look on a global scale, outside countries with social welfare systems and in different periods of history, it has long been established that women would have fewer children if they had more assurance those children would survive to adulthood. Having more kids to get benefits is a very recent and geographically-limited phenomena.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Are you kidding, ron? Women don't have to be literate or modern to know that a period means she is not pregnant. The connection was made tens of thousands of years before the Bible --IF you are a woman, that is.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I don't see it as that strange. We used a doll specially designed to help model potty-training (for girls), and this might be something that would help two-year-old boys get the idea (especially if they didn't have a daddy around). And for families who don't have any boys, this might take the "forbidden knowledge" or "ew" factor out of teaching girls what boys really look like.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Thats what fascinated me about this. We already breed animals for certain traits, and we can now map genes. Breeding existing animals to match a gene map of a bygone animal is a whole new area.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.

Page 163 of 165     first | prev | next | last

Profile for Miss Cellania

  • Member Since 2012/08/04


Blog Posts

  • Posts Written 36,879
  • Comments Received 107,767
  • Post Views 51,310,617
  • Unique Visitors 42,036,595
  • Likes Received 44,636


  • Threads Started 4,819
  • Replies Posted 3,532
  • Likes Received 2,463

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
Learn More