randi 2's Comments

@nutbastard (great name btw not descriptive of your thinking at all)

"...the impact of those interactions caused by my biological drive to have sex with them..."

I'm merely speaking of the lack of progression in a specific area of America, governing forces, not the areas involving your penis.

"...I suggest you take a look outside at what women are naturally inclined to wear..."

If you would have bothered to read and absorb the information into your mind, which seems to be completely focused on genitalia as a counter point, you would have seen that I also said, "The girls put themselves out there to bee ogled, they can say no." It is really no more clear than that. Also, people are not naturally inclined to wear anything, literally and figuratively. That is a horribly blanketed statement. Women who wear clothes like that do it because it makes a statement, makes them feel good about themselves or any other millions of reasons; the same way I wear appropriate clothing to work, fashion-style clothing out and sweat pants while at home. It has nothing to do with a natural instinct but of selective choice for a certain situation and personality. By the way, the argument here is still women's oppression and not who is a slut.

Regardless, simply because you have contempt for the other gender does not mean that they are any less deserving of equality than anyone else. I interact with many moronic men who basically walk around with their heads up their asses and get more than distinguished women in the exact same position. Likewise, women who are idiots are glamorized and given money by....men. If people like you could put your penis aside, you would realize that this is no different than equality between people in any other situation: race, age, sex, class, etc.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Wow, I know you're joking but rats didn't kill people it was the disease in the rats and that still does not justify things like this. I really wish people wouldn't accept ignorance of this kind of thing just for technological advance, it's really pessimistic and speaks poorly of character. Also, there are plenty of humans who are willing to take part in these types of tests, animal testing is outdated and just cruel.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
There really isn't enough freedom with these for bicyclists. I know that I prefer to bike to see the outdoors and take new routes to clear my mind and explore, it's not just about travel. There would also be too much human error for these to get going in the mass public. If one person crashes into another, the whole system would be down. Then,the people behind the crash would have to wait in their little pods for who knows how long. Maybe, if there are some technological aspects that keep things like this from happening it would work but otherwise it jut seems like a neat idea that won't really take off.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.


Page 20 of 21     first | prev | next

Profile for randi 2

  • Member Since 2012/08/04


Statistics

Comments

  • Threads Started 301
  • Replies Posted 0
  • Likes Received 10
  • Abuse Flags 0
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More