Great but I already said I don't need to watch the video since your story already
told me he didn't eat the thing. The video title had already told me that also.

Arrrrrggggghhhhh

Nice molar shots

I didn't watch the video since your story clearly states the bear did not eat the camera. The story title is wrong. There's a huge difference between eating something that your title claims and reading that he did not eat it. You seem to be completely missing my idea.

I can hardly bear this any more.

Oooh Rah! What a marvelous story. Got this ol' swabbie teary eyed. Thanks JF!

Me two. BTW that story was just on Fox News Channel. No mention of Neatorama!

Pooch remind me of Pete the Pup.

PU!

Those guys are MORONS!

That's better.

That wasn't poor Alex. It was piss poor!

We expect better from you.

More confusion. The story title has "Grizzly Bear Eats a GoPro Camera"
Then right below the video title has "Grizzly Bear Attempts to eat GoPro".
The story confirms the second one with "He chomped down a bit before deciding a camera wasn’t good to eat." Tsk Tsk Tsk.

I'm confused. How can it be called a 2nd century lighthouse when a new one was
built over it in the 18th century? Seems to me it's an 18th century lighthouse. The old one is completely covered up by the new one. Lighthouses don't work when they are surrounded by large building blocks.

"During the Eighteenth Century, the architect Eustaquio Giannini conducted a renovation of the site, building a 161-foot tower over the original 112-foot Roman one."

I once saw three water spouts side by side over the Mediterranean Sea many years ago. Water spouts of course are tornadoes over water. I still remember them, I believe my father took a photo of them but I haven't seen it in ages.
I was 10 or 11 at the time. I don't remember anyone being afraid but I bet the
ship's skipper was keeping a wary eye on them. Not that he could have out run them.