Ted's Comments
Funny? Just looked stupid. Skimmed through it.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
That was definitely creepy fetish material.
Can we get some ass-less chaps videos next?
Maybe some large-breasted women jiggling to Milkshake.
Can we get some ass-less chaps videos next?
Maybe some large-breasted women jiggling to Milkshake.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
So what do they wear to work once they've landed the job? It would be better if the group simply gave them the first outfit.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I wonder if it leaves the toilet seat up?
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
A joke should have an element of humour. This one seems very sad. It's a shame they wouldn't contribute to something that monumental.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Maybe some humorous sympathy cards?
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Those Park Planters pots are pretty messed up.
At least the Lego ones aren't so - disturbed.
At least the Lego ones aren't so - disturbed.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I could see a use for an inflatable hooker one.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Lame.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Maybe it was a dinosaur.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
It all makes sense now - he runs around the forest naked.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Seward was still laughing in 1968?
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Kinda naive to say there aren't people working on other more "popular" things like autism, or that research into Ebola is preventing that from happening.
And that Crusador link - awesome-looking text, but they spelled it wrong.
And that Crusador link - awesome-looking text, but they spelled it wrong.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Wow, thanks!
I guess I won't get the shuffle, but what the heck - $50 is a great bonus for running your mouth off.
I guess I won't get the shuffle, but what the heck - $50 is a great bonus for running your mouth off.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
It's nice that Wal-Mart did it, even though they had every right not to. So what if it was only to save face?
It's not a case of legality, morality, or ethics. In fact, the Shanks seem to be the ones working the system. For example, he divorced his wife so she could get more money out of Medicaid. That's not very honest or fair to others who are not cheating the system.
Now the cost of benefits and access to those benefits for other Wal-Mart employees will increase. Is that "right"?