I see a flaw in that logic. Does this mean that libraries are funded by fines? If so, then libraries are doing themselves a disservice by encouraging people to return material on time. In fact, it seems they must welcome that source of added revenue. And forcing someone to give food to the poor? Shocking! Oh, they're NOT forcing people to do that? It's just a way to save $2.00. No, I don't get VaneWimsey's point.
Can you really call it a Disney thing? Luke grows up in his uncle and aunt's home, and they're killed in the first 20 minutes. Young Annakin (shudder) gets given away by his mother, he is apparently the product of parthenogenesis, and she dies in the second movie anyway. Leia - adopted. No strong mother figure.
Can you blame the second Darrin for the show's troubles? A lof of the original episodes were well-thought-out stories about acceptance and tolerance. By the time Darrin #2 came in, the stories were formulaic. Magic stuff happens, Darrin's boss/client/etc sees it, and Samantha saves the day with a catchy jingle to tie up the freaky loose ends. It's as painful as the "everybody knows but nobody knows" formula that is Dexter, or the "never get off the island" formula of Gilligan's Island (or Lost).
That's a lot of explanation for the fact that we're just not used to seeing old-timey pictures in colour. Plus, we expect old-timey pictures to have stilted and uncomfortable poses.
And forcing someone to give food to the poor? Shocking! Oh, they're NOT forcing people to do that? It's just a way to save $2.00.
No, I don't get VaneWimsey's point.
Looks like it would be difficult to open and close.
Looks like just because someone uses the technique of chiaroscuro doesn't make them a master of chiaroscuro.
Oh my god, they're turkeys!
Luke grows up in his uncle and aunt's home, and they're killed in the first 20 minutes. Young Annakin (shudder) gets given away by his mother, he is apparently the product of parthenogenesis, and she dies in the second movie anyway. Leia - adopted. No strong mother figure.