I sometimes crawl off my stained mattress after a heavy night of drinking and go to the store in my perjammers. Everyone else at the trailer park does the same thing. I scratch my 'roids in public, and urinate in potted plants at the mall. What is the big deal as long as I am happy? Mind yer own beeswax please.
Genuine artists who are green made these tumblers, so they are special. The ones we made and still make are the clumsy, unskilled products of proles, even if they look exactly the same.
There has been talk of reflecting ads off of the moon, but nothing ever came of it. Giant, floating ads, with the apparent earthbound size of the moon is still being discussed. These "Ad Moons" would float through the night sky, illuminated for all to see.
Should Americans alone bear the shame of the desecration of Egypt's monuments? No, though ultimately it is the amoral crassness of corporations that is to blame.
Good idea, but some nut cyclist will take this out on the road and then complain about discourteous drivers causing the inevitable accident.
As for "Jazz on your face", she must make it known that she is a female for fear of being branded gay, maybe. You all know what the "Jazz" refers to here, don't you?
As for the copyright issue, I agree with tb23. Sadly and typically, it is the cost of litigation that is generally the downfall of the parodist.
(It may also be noted that the cost of litigation tends to obscure the rights and protections that copyright law provides in other ways. Off topic, but interestingly, there are works that have technically fallen from copyright protection but are owned by large corporations that demand royalties for what should be fair and unrestricted use. Few have the resources to challenge these corporation's claims. The cost to pay for these royalties of non-copyrighted works is passed on to the consumer.)
At the end of Hostel II, use was found for a body-less head, bringing joy to some impoverished, homeless children. If when we are dead, our bodies can be used in a creative way, why not?
Contrary to popular belief, frivolous lawsuits are nearly always exposed and dismissed, sometimes with negative legal consequences to the plaintiff and the plaintiff's attorney. Most cases that may seem frivolous when excitedly reported by an overheated media and sly politicians to a gullible public, actually do have merit and are decided accordingly. Attempting to limit our legal rights as non-corporate individuals by raising the frivolous lawsuit bugbear is a favorite perennial ploy of politicians.
Should Americans alone bear the shame of the desecration of Egypt's monuments? No, though ultimately it is the amoral crassness of corporations that is to blame.
As for "Jazz on your face", she must make it known that she is a female for fear of being branded gay, maybe. You all know what the "Jazz" refers to here, don't you?
As for the copyright issue, I agree with tb23. Sadly and typically, it is the cost of litigation that is generally the downfall of the parodist.
(It may also be noted that the cost of litigation tends to obscure the rights and protections that copyright law provides in other ways. Off topic, but interestingly, there are works that have technically fallen from copyright protection but are owned by large corporations that demand royalties for what should be fair and unrestricted use. Few have the resources to challenge these corporation's claims. The cost to pay for these royalties of non-copyrighted works is passed on to the consumer.)