Tempscire's Comments
I just wanted to say that I enjoyed the "more" cut, which has probably been used for a while now, but nonetheless, yay.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
That number seems surprisingly low.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I love high quality, full color images like this. It makes the past seem so much more immediate.
Aw, #20...so many barefoot kids...
Aw, #20...so many barefoot kids...
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Rip-off of Unhappy Hipsters?
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
But the rats still died after having grown lung installed. :p I guess it's still progress.
Also, my brain tries to imagine surgery on rats and their teeny little lungs and just gives up. How do you even attach something like? Jeesh.
Also, my brain tries to imagine surgery on rats and their teeny little lungs and just gives up. How do you even attach something like? Jeesh.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
This tripe? Oh, Neatorama, not you, too.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Wonder how much it reacts like other swear censors I've encounter that cancel out innocuous words like Dickens and niggardly.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
"Technicians who examined it removed the back, but found “nothing but cobwebs and spiders”."
So there.
1. Yeah, 'cause no other report of a hoax has ever claimed experts of one kind or another were stumped or verified it as legit.
2. Weasel words. "Technicians."-- who are they and why aren't they explicitly named and quoted in the article? Experts say this sounds suspect.
So there.
1. Yeah, 'cause no other report of a hoax has ever claimed experts of one kind or another were stumped or verified it as legit.
2. Weasel words. "Technicians."-- who are they and why aren't they explicitly named and quoted in the article? Experts say this sounds suspect.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
For some reason I imagine them pronouncing it "Ver-sales." I don't know why.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Maybe they should just leave it as this virtual rendering. At least it'll actually be finished that way...
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
@Nick Gisburne
I'd like to point out that just because the actual manuscripts are owned does not mean their copyright is. Even unpublished works pass into the public domain: in this case, 70 years after the author's death. So while any presentation or edits or whatnot may be copyrightable, the actual content itself still is not.
I'd like to point out that just because the actual manuscripts are owned does not mean their copyright is. Even unpublished works pass into the public domain: in this case, 70 years after the author's death. So while any presentation or edits or whatnot may be copyrightable, the actual content itself still is not.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Lady C, I'm "forbidden" as well.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Oh god, that's terrible. (To look at I mean; though I guess it's probably in terrible taste as well.)
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
lulu, I'm pretty sure "the world" is actually quite accustomed to non-white leaders. =p
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
The "meh" button implies indifference and apathy. Those subtexts have their place, to be sure, but aren't any substitute for an active dislike.
The main advantage to a "dislike" button that I see is offering solidarity for the bumps in life. "I got locked out of my house again"-- "liking" or even "meh-ing" that makes you look like a jerk (assuming your relationship with said friend doesn't involve lots of teasing).
Surely I am not the only one here who only has people I'm actually interested in (and not their apps) come up in my feed? If you (general you) so often feel the need for a "you're wasting my time" button, either you need to get off FB or remove the offending party...or do you not care so much you can't stand to see your friend count go down, even if it would give you less to whine about?