If you had the hands of a LEGO minifig, what would they look like? Comic book artist James McKelvie directs us to this image. These flesh claws would actually be useful for precision tool work. We'll have to change the way keyboards are designed, though.
Gangsta's Paradise by Coolio was a #1 hit in 1995. For the upcoming Oktoberfest, YouTuber There I Ruined It (previously) turned it into a Bavarian polka. All it took was a couple of tubas, an accordion, some lederhosen, and lots of nerve. (via Laughing Squid)
Being around here on the planet millions of years even before the appearance of the first humans, it is not surprising that hippos know more about life than we do. Having been here on this planet longer than we have, these animals have realized many truths about life. Most of these truths, however, are hard-hitting truths, and we still might not be ready to hear them.
From afar, the squirrel sees the hazelnuts that Jeffrey Wang placed strategically inside the soundboard of a teeny-tiny grand piano. As the squirrel approached the tiny musical instrument, Wang, a musician and photographer, knew that his lure worked.
And as it reached its tiny claws inside to retrieve the snack, it was caught ‘playing’ the piano.
The player you control hits the tennis ball back to the other side of the court. Unfortunately, the ball goes out of bounds. And then you see the player blurt out a curse word on your screen.
When Super Tennis was originally released in Japan in 1991, the in-game tennis players would exclaim the world “s***”. The North American and UK versions, however, substituted “rats” instead.
Recently, however, the game was re-released on the Nintendo switch, but the Japanese version remains unchanged. The profanity is still there.
While some people in Japan might be aware that the word is profanity, many are not, and it does pop up in mainstream media. On a recent Japanese TV drama, for example, one character exclaimed the word.
Though, it’s still wild to see the word on kid-friendly Nintendo hardware.
Tony Williams had no one to talk to. Ever since his wife Jo died of pancreatic cancer last year, Tony spent his days just sitting near the phone, hoping that it would ring. It didn’t.
Without any family nearby, Tony put two adverts in his local newspaper looking for a friend to chat to, but didn’t get any replies.
In a bid to find a pal to listen to music with, or just chat in the garden, Tony had business cards made to hand out when he went to the supermarket or out for a walk.
The 75-year-old physicist, however, did not receive any phone calls, despite his efforts. Finally, he decided to put up a poster on his window.
“I have lost Jo, my lovely wife and soul mate. I have no friends and family, no one to talk to. I find the unremitting silence 24 hours a day unbearable torture,” wrote Tony on the poster. “Can no one help me?”
Now, after spending a summer “waiting for the phone to ring,” Tony has been swamped by the responses.
He is enjoying chatting on the phone to strangers—now friends—from around the world,
People from America, Germany, Holland, Australia, Egypt, India, and Japan have been in touch inviting him on road trips to the U.S. or for an afternoon drinking gin and tonics.
[...]
“I’ve just been completely overwhelmed and am so thankful for it all,” he said.
Earlier this week, Reese Witherspoon posted a 24-year-old photo of her and Paul Rudd on her Instagram. “Wait a second… did #Paul Rudd and I take the “Selfie” in 1996?” she wondered on the post. But really, who invented the selfie?
It seems that other celebrities like Britney Spears have been taking selfies long before it was cool, and Bill Nye, along with Witherspoon, have been doing that long before the term was even coined. But as to who really invented the selfie, the answer to that is a bit complicated.
Many people have tried to claim the selfie as their own, with some photos even dating back to 1920. So who, in all this madness is actually responsible for the modern-day self portrait? Well, It turns out the old adage of "but first, let me take a selfie," is actually more like "But ere we go, permit thee to capture a self portrait" -- depending on how you define certain terms.
According to The New York Times, one of the oldest "selfies" may span as far back as 1839, when Robert Cornelius, a Philadelphia-based chemist with a passion for photography, ran into the frame of a photo. "The first light Picture ever taken. 1839," he wrote on the back of the photograph. 10/10 titling, spot on... or was it...
But does a selfie require a camera to be called a “selfie”? Or does it just have to be a self-portrait?
By that logic, could one argue that painters with likely self-portraits like say, Jan Van Eyck in the 1400s are the art form's true forefathers? What about other drawings? Scribbles on ancient notepads?
The hearing aids available on the market are expensive. In the United States, a pair of hearing aids costs around $4,700 on average. Considering that the lowest salary in the US is around $1,250 a month, a person under that bracket would have to work for four months in order to buy a pair of hearing aids. But that doesn’t have to be the case.
Researchers led by M. Saad Bhamla, have developed a proof-of-concept device which could lead to affordable hearing aids in the future.
The ultra-low-cost proof-of-concept device known as LoCHAid is designed to be easily manufactured and repaired in locations where conventional hearing aids are priced beyond the reach of most citizens. The minimalist device is expected to meet most of the World Health Organization's targets for hearing aids aimed at mild-to-moderate age-related hearing loss. The prototypes built so far look like wearable music players instead of a traditional behind-the-ear hearing aids.
"The challenge we set for ourselves was to build a minimalist hearing aid, determine how good it would be and ask how useful it would be to the millions of people who could use it," said M. Saad Bhamla, an assistant professor in the School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. "The need is obvious because conventional hearing aids cost a lot and only a fraction of those who need them have access."
[...]
"We have shown that it is possible to build a hearing aid for less than the price of a cup of coffee," he said. "This is a first step, a platform technology, and we've shown that low cost doesn't have to mean low quality."
Of course, this affordable device offers fewer features than the expensive ones available, but Bhamla compares this issue to buying a basic and a luxury car.
Learn more details about this over at MedicalXpress.
There is a lot of wind available here on land, and, as we all know, wind is a good source of renewable energy. This wind, however, is too weak to make wind turbine blades move. It appears that we could use this breeze to generate power, not through a wind turbine, but through this nanogenerator.
The method, presented September 23 in the journal Cell Reports Physical Science, is a low-cost and efficient way of collecting light breezes as a micro-energy source.
[...]
"You can collect all the breeze in your everyday life," says senior author Ya Yang of Beijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences. "We once placed our nanogenerator on a person's arm, and a swinging arm's airflow was enough to generate power."
A breeze as gentle as 1.6 m/s (3.6 mph) was enough to power the triboelectric nanogenerator designed by Yang and his colleagues. The nanogenerator performs at its best when wind velocity is between 4 to 8 m/s (8.9 to 17.9 mph), a speed that allows the two plastic strips to flutter in sync. The device also has a high wind-to-energy conversion efficiency of 3.23%, a value that exceeds previously reported performances on wind energy scavenging. Currently, the research team's device can power up 100 LED lights and temperature sensors.
Learn more about this nanogenerator over at TechXplore.
This is phenomenal!
(Image Credit: Xin Chen, Xiaojing Mu, and Ya Yang/ TechXplore)
On September 21, at around 6PM, a 37-year-old man from Wythenshawe, named Wesley Hamnett, finished an incredible feat of travelling 230 miles in six days on a bike. But he did not ride on a grown man’s bike, but on the bike of a little kid — his daughter’s pink bike. Why did he do all of that, you ask? For charity, of course!
So far, he's raised an incredible £6,000 - including offline donations - and all the money he has raised will go to a selection of charities, including Macmillan, Christie Hospital, British Heart Foundation and his local hospital in Wythenshawe.
[...]
He explains: "The main reason is that my grandparents all passed away, the last one was last year - my grandad Fred.
"That was a bit of a sad time really, knowing that I'd not got any grandparents left. So I thought, 'I want to do something significant,' you know, to raise money for the people that have helped them all through our lives."
Sharing the details of his plans on Twitter, Wes said that if he could get 1000 retweets on his post, he would do it on his daughter's bike, rather than his own - and so he did, which must have looked unusual to say the least.
One of the most difficult challenges when it comes to writing is making your readers laugh. If visual comedy is already difficult to achieve, just imagine if you only have words as your medium to make your audience giggle and laugh, not to mention that you also have to persuade your readers to immerse themselves into the world where your story is happening. Sure, there are simple ways to make your audience laugh, such as using funny names for characters or places, but those are not going to last long. So how do you make your readers laugh without resorting to that? In his piece over at QDT, Erik Deckers gives us four tools that could prove useful to us when writing humor. These are: the iceberg theory, surprise, relatability, and exaggeration.
The world's nuclear waste facilities are buried underground and pretty well documented. But what about thousands of years from now, when it will still be radioactive, but there's a good possibility that our languages and cultures will have completely changed, and our present documentation is inaccessible? How will we warn future civilizations away from such dangerous sites? That question was posed to a group of scientists in the 1990s, and their brainstormed ideas were imaginative and often quite weird. Could artificial intelligence do any better? Janelle Shane (previously at Neatorama) trained a neural network on the question by feeding it the human-generated ideas. The ideas that the algorithm came back with were quite bonkers. They range from those that would more likely attract people,
A series of very-large-scale sculptures of robots, which would be visually striking and memorable from a distance.
to the unlikely,
A massive device that would alter the flow of time and gravity in the vicinity.
to the terrifying.
A large cluster of enormous worms growing from a rocky surface, extruding bubbling fluid, and emitting audible chittering noises.
It's a challenge from redditor plizzaslayer111. If you tried and then want to give up and see the cat, first go to the post and double click on the picture to make it huge. Then it will be clear. -via Digg
In the Bible, Jonah was swallowed up by a big fish because he tried to avoid God's command to go to Ninevah. He was ejected alive three days later. In 1910, a similar story appeared in Australian newspapers.
One of the employees at the Bega whaleries (reports the Sydney Sun) is recovering from a mixed attack of fright, hysterics and fainting. He was engaged cutting up a whale a day or two ago, and when he had cleaved away the flesh from one side of the stomach he saw what appeared to be the fully dressed body of a young lady lying inside.
At first he thought she was dead, and he was considering the advisability of going off to report to the police when the young lady rubbed her eyes and sat up. The whaler fell off the whale. But the young lady was not even a ghost. – The Bendigo Independent, November 18, 1910
Oh yeah, you better believe there is more to the story, which ranges from a perfectly reasonable explanation to "That can't be true!" You can read the rest of the newspaper account at Second Glance History. -via Strange Company