When the cover art for Catwoman #0 was released it was severely criticized, and Guillem March caught a bunch of flack for both the unnatural pose of the character and the supposedly exploitative nature of the illustration.
Well, Guillem apparently had a good sense of humor about the whole "controversy", and decided to answer back with another version in the style of Robert Crumb.
So why was the obviously comical version generally well received while the original version was vilified?
Link --via ComicsAlliance
Load More Comments Commenting is closed.