Alex Santoso's Comments

Cowboyshoe - I completely understand. It's one of the idiosyncrasies that became the norm in the blogosphere.

Scooter - I've been meaning to add back the next/previous buttons. Here they are. Thanks for reminding me!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
che - ;)

All right - I've been called out to share my point of view. That's fair. Here it is.

I'm all for gentrification (in most cases) because it generates a huge amount of economic activity. Short of war, housing and construction provide one of the biggest engines of job and wealth creation. Yes, there are bubbles that pop (Japan's, Hong Kong's and our very own real estate bubbles come to mind) but long-term appreciation in real estate value is real.

Gentrification results in new homes, new restaurants, new shops - all of which provide new jobs. Keeping a neighborhood in squalor does not.

There's a knee jerk reaction that corporations are to blame. Actually, if you want to blame someone, blame the hipsters.

The first wave of "gentrifiers" aren't corporations or real estate developers looking to make a quick buck. They are typically young "trend setters" who establish artist colonies and open small shops, bars, and restaurants in places with cheap rents (as well as industrial areas). In the 1960s, artists and hippies gentrified Manhattan. In the 1990s, gays played a big role in gentrifying San Francisco neighborhoods.

Another false charge is that gentrification is racist. This is an easy charge to make given the socio-economic status of many minorities being displaced, but it fails to take into account that gentrification occur all over the world and across racial boundaries.

(Indeed, when gay people "gentrified" San Francisco, African-American communities screamed racism - in turn, gays accused them of being homophobic)

Gentrification is also not new, folks. Roman historians recorded instances of shops and villages being replaced by villas. It is also not stopping because its part of the natural ebb and flow of urban life.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
bk, do you prefer squalor?

I'm neither an imbecile racist nor a corporate tool, nor a person who resorts to name-calling during a debate simply because another person's point of view doesn't jive with mine.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
But what about the Arctic and Antarctica? Both aren't owned by any country per se, but they are "administered" by some. There are treaties and International laws that govern territorial claims for both places.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)

Page 212 of 351     first | prev | next | last

Profile for Alex Santoso

  • Member Since 2012/07/17


Blog Posts

  • Posts Written 21,492
  • Comments Received 159,799
  • Post Views 33,342,318
  • Unique Visitors 24,744,313
  • Likes Received 9,222


  • Threads Started 8,006
  • Replies Posted 2,624
  • Likes Received 1,496