To be fair, I guess tea is the normal drink in Britain. I couldn't get brewed coffee in China, either -I was lucky to get instant. But I hear the Middle East has coffee that will blow your socks off!
Well, of course it's viral advertising, for Australian tourism. I first heard about it on NPR last night. They know what they're doing, and they're doing it well.
A friend of mine wrote to the creator of the test about the water question, and received this in return. I got permission to post it because he's really busy stamping out all the fires this quiz has set!
Dear Duke
OK take 100%
I receive more emails concerning this question than all the others together.
The answer given on the web site is, as you say, incorrect and needs adjusting, but then it would not be controversial and I would probably not get any feedback.
The syllogism itself is invalid and can only be considered as a strong inductive argument and not deductive. It is the 'we can predict' part of the conclusion which comes from nowhere, so the argument is not strictly formal. Not everyone agrees with this so I will leave you to draw your own conclusions. I discuss these points in my book if I may put in a plug!
However, just as an aside there are other types of water. Heavy water for example is water in which the hydrogen is replaced by its heavier isotope, deuteruim (D2O). It is chemically almost identical to normal water but looks, feels and tastes exactly the same. But don't drink it. This says nothing about the validity but only about the truth of the conclusion.
Actually, I've never seen one....
Cab Calloway would say "Hidey-hidey-hidey-ho" and women would magically appear at the backstage door.
http://www.misscellania.com/miss-cellania/2008/1/6/snowfall.html
Dear Duke
OK take 100%
I receive more emails concerning this question than all the others together.
The answer given on the web site is, as you say, incorrect and needs adjusting, but then it would not be controversial and I would probably not get any feedback.
The syllogism itself is invalid and can only be considered as a strong inductive argument and not deductive. It is the 'we can predict' part of the conclusion which comes from nowhere, so the argument is not strictly formal. Not everyone agrees with this so I will leave you to draw your own conclusions. I discuss these points in my book if I may put in a plug!
However, just as an aside there are other types of water. Heavy water for example is water in which the hydrogen is replaced by its heavier isotope, deuteruim (D2O). It is chemically almost identical to normal water but looks, feels and tastes exactly the same. But don't drink it. This says nothing about the validity but only about the truth of the conclusion.
Thanks again for the feedback and comments,
Colin Beckley