John, I think this is exactly the amount of development the comic needs.
BTW, the Tolley Problem has a legal solution: Do not alter course. Inaction is not a crime.

Bought a house with an underground (most of the time) river. Learned that redirecting it made me liable for any damage done by the resulting flow. Only option was to bury pipes to take it to the storm drains. Cannot imagine having to pay for the Mississippi’s damages.

Of course, it takes a New Yorker to call Central Park "the wild."

It takes a certain type of individual to consider proofreading a game, i. e. challenging and fun. Miss C, thank you for being that type.

https://www.iheart.com/podcast/139-noble-blood-46601390/episode/lovers-and-la-maupin-84991750/
For those who like podcasts.

I think they are also over-thinking the solution. How hard could it be to install a light switch in each room?

Does anyone else remember why there are two two cups for detergent?

Needs to take a big swig when first opened to keep from spilling when going around corners. (Alternate comment: Who can't kill a Tecate before it goes flat?)

Given the option of using or not using on a wound, chose using.

I suspect that the ruling had nothing to do with "originality." More likley is that no copyright was filed or even available in the EU or Luxembourg. Perhaps Zhang did not own the copyright (perhaps it is owned by Harper's) and therefore did not have standing to bring the suit.
If the goals were to embarrass the "fine artist" and Bring Zhang publicity, then he has won.

An added benefit is that they dampen line movement in high winds.

With our new laws, people have been getting out of the store even faster than self-checkout. It is called non-checkout. They just leave without paying. Any theft less than $1,000 will not be prosecuted.

Whole Lalo Schrifin Goin' On