Chay Hawes's Comments

Just to clarify, I don't think anyone here is in any way angry at you for your neatorama post. Just bemused by that portion of the original article on flavorwire.
I'd say that to anyone who has seen animated films, their 3D/2D mistake would be the equivalent of saying "I loved the wizard of Oz but I really wish it was in colour" or conversely "The Artist was a great film but the actors voices were terrible!" Anyone seeing a still from Toy Story (3D) and a still from Aladdin (2D) would be able to see that they are totally different in style, and the same is true of Tangled - it's very clearly in the 3D Toy Story style rather than the hand drawn 2D style. It makes me wonder if they were confusing Tangled with one of Disney's other movies.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
  2 replies
Because it looks 3D. 2D animation has a certain look. the little mermaid, 101 dalmations, they look hand drawn. I've not seen tangled either but it's 3D models and lighting and cameras. (3D as in modelled in the computer and rendered, rather than 3D as in 3D glasses)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
What's weird is that the article suggests that Tangled is a "throwback to the classic Disney style" and "Hand-drawn animation" "averaging a cell a day". But anyone looking at even one still from it (such as the one on this page!) can see that it's 3D, not hand drawn! Not sure if the rest of their article is any more accurate than that obvious howler!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.


Page 3 of 4     first | prev | next

Profile for Chay Hawes

  • Member Since 2012/09/21


Statistics

Comments

  • Threads Started 38
  • Replies Posted 8
  • Likes Received 15
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More