It's a 1-up.

I can understand them maybe not knowing what sheep look like since they aren't common there, but don't they know what a dog looks like? Seriously, who would spend that kind of money on a dog without knowing anything about the breed before the purchase? This is beyond stupid.

http://www.remnantofgod.org/creation.htm#brain

God doesn't have a beginning. Without faith, you can't comprehend that. "Few places is the lack of evidence for a creator more evident that in the science of microbiology. The interior of cells are really messy, obviously cobbled together in a hap hazard way which no omniscient engineer would be proud of. Mitochondrial DNA is perhaps the most glaring example I can think of." This to me looks like a perfect example of intellegent design. Yeah, it is a mess and very complex, but it's all necessary for it to function correctly. I find it hard to believe that all those pieces fell together just right to make that cell function the way it does. The more complex something is, the more it points to an intellegent designer.

It sounds to me like mrgoodbar has not done the research for the opposing side. How can you say "The beauty of science though is that anyone, with enough study, can understand it all."? Even the brightest sceintific minds don't understand it all. If that were so, they wouldn't have to keep studying it. You act as though you think science is flawless. Science constantly contradicts itself over and over. It's not a solid structure to base ones beliefs on. Science is constantly changing, often disregarding previous beliefs for new ones.

Looks to me like a bunch of ideas that nobody has conclusive evidence for. Therefore all you have is a theory. Just a bunch of scientific ideas. You still can't say evolution is to credit for today's life on earth. I still have a completely accurate New Testament about a man that really lived, and really did fulfil the prophecies of the older writings of the Old Testament. Therefore he has proven the Old Testament to be accurate as well. God is our intellegent designer. You can't prove the Bible wrong, and you can't prove your evolution to be right. As a Christian, I have nothing to lose and everything to gain in my beliefs. You, on the other hand, well, good luck.

Oparin - Taking into account the recent discovery of methane in the atmospheres of Jupiter and the other giant planets, Oparin postulated that the infant Earth had possessed a strongly reducing atmosphere, containing methane, ammonia, hydrogen, and water vapor. In his opinion, these were the raw materials for the evolution of life.

~He has an opinion, not a fact.~

Miller - In the 1950s, Urey theorized that the early atmosphere of the Earth was probably like the atmosphere now present on Jupiter --i.e., rich in ammonia, methane, and hydrogen. Miller, working in his laboratory at the University of Chicago, demonstrated that when exposed to an energy source such as ultraviolet radiation, these compounds and water can react to produce amino acids essential for the formation of living matter. However, the early atmosphere of the Earth is no longer believed to have had this composition.

~Did you read that last part?~

Everything started with a protein? Where did we get this protein? If a cell can't be created by a thunderbolt, how do you explain where this protein came from?

If evolution is a process of natural selection and adaptation to ones environment, why did all the species, other than humans, that evolved from monkeys not make it? Wouldn't they have been better suited for the environment than the monkeys? If everything started with a single cell organism, where did that single cell organism come from?