In previous social experiments, I've read that the average "comfortable" standing distance for two socially engaged individuals changes by culture. In England, it is more than 4 feet, in the US it is around three, and in China it can be as little as two or sometimes less. I've seen this in experience too. I (American) work with tons of foreigners and I've found that when I feel uncomfortably close to a Chinese friend and I casually step back, they [probably unconsciously] step forward... It gets annoying to be honest. The same goes the opposite way with my Euro friends. Odd, but true. I've just learned [also unconsciously] to adjust to this when I'm talking to someone from this or that or that other or that other other country.
That's not an easy piece to sing for ANYONE. These boys here did a fantastic job. It was meant to be fun and I don't doubt that they had fun doing it even though the one on the left looked a bit too serious. Embarrassing? Not really. They're children, singing as cats, cute, nuff said. The smirk on the one on the right says enough.
The lawyer in the defense will have to define d-bag and prove that the plantif is in fact one. Since there are direct connotations and implications of this particular word, not to mention the rest of what he accused the alleged d-bag of being, the defendant has defamed his character by definition. Unless of course, the accusations are true.
As for the picture, he had the right to take it and publish it. The exception to this exemption is pictures of children (I believe) and certainly when a person has clear reason to assume he is in private. A casino is NOT such a "private place." He'll win the case, especially if he can produce evidence that it has directly damaged his professional life in some way, which it seems he can.
Black
http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/medalsmementoes/boyscoutbadge.htm
do i win?!
He's even more square than other astronauts...
In fact he's like nerdiness cubed...
...
ok, that's enough.
As for the picture, he had the right to take it and publish it. The exception to this exemption is pictures of children (I believe) and certainly when a person has clear reason to assume he is in private. A casino is NOT such a "private place." He'll win the case, especially if he can produce evidence that it has directly damaged his professional life in some way, which it seems he can.