Foreigner1's Comments
It's us right? It's the hole on the ozone-layer that does it. It's our burning up fossil fuels and squandering our world- Thát's why the universe will live shorter...!
Has the Green Movement gotten new ammo........!
Has the Green Movement gotten new ammo........!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
So I'm really a throwback to some 7.500 years or more ago- I'm intolerant of the stuff...
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
It is an old 19th-Century kitchen-appliance.
You hang -small- meat from it above a fire or above smoke and let it turn by the clockwork-mechanism in it that you can wind up by the key. It then turns the short bronze side abound slowly.
You hang -small- meat from it above a fire or above smoke and let it turn by the clockwork-mechanism in it that you can wind up by the key. It then turns the short bronze side abound slowly.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I'm truly shocked and will reconsider my vising to Neatorama. How Dáre you to have a photograph of this ....-Item-.... on this site!?!?!? Have you no shame???
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
It didn't take 750 years. At fist it took about 30 years. Then some 700 years nothing was done except that most officials said that no research could be done.
And then from 1898 that first reverse photograph was made. And then it went about silent for some 90 years again. Finally from 1988 on, science came "on line" because the Church finally gave uneasy access to the cloth.
Not 750 years- At best and stretched to breaking point in this interpretation over all that time- some 70-80 years.
And then from 1898 that first reverse photograph was made. And then it went about silent for some 90 years again. Finally from 1988 on, science came "on line" because the Church finally gave uneasy access to the cloth.
Not 750 years- At best and stretched to breaking point in this interpretation over all that time- some 70-80 years.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
This becomes some modern version of such an overly over-designed supermachine that costs zillions to....
push a marble so it rolls a few inches or something like that.
push a marble so it rolls a few inches or something like that.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
No mare, it only took some 750 years.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
...
Insane in da membrane-
Insane in da brain!
Insane in da membrane-
Crazy insane- Got no brain!
Cypres Hill :-D
Insane in da membrane-
Insane in da brain!
Insane in da membrane-
Crazy insane- Got no brain!
Cypres Hill :-D
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
This shroud-thing is becoming funnily just like crop-circles:
Both items have folks who not only say they can duplicate them- both items have people who testify that they are the ones who are the makers.
And in both cases there's a whole load of people who refuse thos testimonies and keep saying Nó that is not you who did that because we just knów that humans cannot make them: That is Divine-Non-terrestrial-Non-Human!!!
Uhhhhhhhh..........
....Am I missing something here? Or are they.....?
:-D
Both items have folks who not only say they can duplicate them- both items have people who testify that they are the ones who are the makers.
And in both cases there's a whole load of people who refuse thos testimonies and keep saying Nó that is not you who did that because we just knów that humans cannot make them: That is Divine-Non-terrestrial-Non-Human!!!
Uhhhhhhhh..........
....Am I missing something here? Or are they.....?
:-D
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
This one is not based on the Cornsweet-principle. This is just graduations like I had to make when I had to learn to mix colours in paint-restauring class.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I go with the Fish Slapping Dance, closely followed by The Knights Who Say IeckeTePangZoooooo-Pong.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
...And we upgraded that left window to triple-glazing.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Dear lady,
The same colour is not present. Would it be the same colour, you would be able to take out the 2 middle colours and see no difference. The minimal difference in colous causes the brain to perceive the difference that is there as a difference in light or shadow. Therein lies the illusion.
The same colour is not present. Would it be the same colour, you would be able to take out the 2 middle colours and see no difference. The minimal difference in colous causes the brain to perceive the difference that is there as a difference in light or shadow. Therein lies the illusion.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Dear Lady Handbasket,
The story of the shroud of Turin to my knowledge is as follows:
The first consistent and without doubt to this cloth connectable refence is from 1357 when the cloth was displayed in Lirey, France. Bishop Henry the Poities had spoken with an artist who confessed in making the cloth on request of a servant of Geoffroy de Charny, Lord of Savoisy and Lirey. Geoffroy was known to be in need of revenues (cash), so he did what was done more often during that time- He arranged a holy artifact to be made to generate modernly said- tourism to his part of the woods.
As far as I know, there is writing on this between Pierre d'Arcis and pope Clement. The Bishop of Troyes around the 1370's-80's was firmly convinced that the cloth was fake after he and his team had spoken to several people who had been involved in the scam. The research and documents lie in the Vatican.
The artist used what knowledge he had at that time and he did hid with the materials he had at that time. Nothing more, nothing less. All the tests on the materials so far have shown dating around the time of fiorst appearance, so that correlates.
The man portrayed on the cloth is with a hairdo like how people thought Jesus would have looked back then- With long hair, mustache and beard. That was a hairdothat came into fashion in Europe since the Great Migrations at the end of the Roman Western Empire. Yet like Another Tim already brings up- It is highly unlikely that Jesus would look like that, because that was not how men looked over there at that time, with stricter rules of appearance than nowadays and with different hairgrow on the men in that region.
The story of the shroud of Turin to my knowledge is as follows:
The first consistent and without doubt to this cloth connectable refence is from 1357 when the cloth was displayed in Lirey, France. Bishop Henry the Poities had spoken with an artist who confessed in making the cloth on request of a servant of Geoffroy de Charny, Lord of Savoisy and Lirey. Geoffroy was known to be in need of revenues (cash), so he did what was done more often during that time- He arranged a holy artifact to be made to generate modernly said- tourism to his part of the woods.
As far as I know, there is writing on this between Pierre d'Arcis and pope Clement. The Bishop of Troyes around the 1370's-80's was firmly convinced that the cloth was fake after he and his team had spoken to several people who had been involved in the scam. The research and documents lie in the Vatican.
The artist used what knowledge he had at that time and he did hid with the materials he had at that time. Nothing more, nothing less. All the tests on the materials so far have shown dating around the time of fiorst appearance, so that correlates.
The man portrayed on the cloth is with a hairdo like how people thought Jesus would have looked back then- With long hair, mustache and beard. That was a hairdothat came into fashion in Europe since the Great Migrations at the end of the Roman Western Empire. Yet like Another Tim already brings up- It is highly unlikely that Jesus would look like that, because that was not how men looked over there at that time, with stricter rules of appearance than nowadays and with different hairgrow on the men in that region.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
:-D