cfsteak's Comments

TOTALLY, COMPLETELY, FUCKING NATURAL.

They would've found trinkets from the get-go. They haven't.

Not only that, I won't believe that a place like this got swallowed and sank to the bottom of an on-rushing ocean within the last 50,000 years. No way. Ice Age change in climate don't happen overnight like that. And since we as intelligent human beings have only been able to do stuff like invent the wheel within that time, no fricking way am I going to believe this shite.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I don't get what the big deal is.

The house doesn't fit the surroundings, the colours clash all over the place, far too manhy flat surfaces that can catch the leaves, debris and rainfall that can all make the place very dirty - and where does all the shit, piss and dirty bathwater go? Down the pristine creek? Nice.

Another way to ruin a perfect natural setting of the forest and the creek.

See the thing about FLW is he is completely misunderstood. He kept building houses and buildings where he shounldn't have - and that's why the buildings seemed so much more than what they were, mostly eyesores to the environment in which he stuck them. He didn't care about the nature surrounding the buildings, otherwise he wouldn't have put them there.

This one in particular is out-dated, ridiculous, and competely wasteful. Why would anyone think that such a thing is beautiful is beyond my comprehension. I suppose that's because I don't like to dirty up nature more than we need to, or already to by doing this sort of thing. Cos in the infrastructure is all we have in the modern world and no one's really going to care when the pipes underneath the house burst and pollutes.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I am an expert on cranes and various kinds of string/rope.

You can see, at the very beginning as he makes his initial lift, that there is a slight shimmy as the string he's using (most likely some kind of piano string/fish string) to the side - and that basically gives it away.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Not only that, why would the person next to you want to be blinded by the screen adjacent?

OK so looking at the photo carefully, the seat is closer to the screen when in a normal sitting position. But, like I said, it's annoying to have to be distracted by the adjacent screen being so close.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
So dumb.

Look how far the video screen is!
What's the point of putting a large screen when it's that far away? They might as well have just put in a smaller LCD closer to the passenger's arm-rest like everyone else and saved the energy.

So typically American. So dumb. So stupid.

OK, so now you've got a perfectly good bed to sleep in - that means that most people won't even be watching the LCD, they'll be sleeping! Sheesh! Don't you Yanks ever think about conservation of energy and resources? Stop wasting!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.


Page 7 of 9     first | prev | next | last

Profile for cfsteak

  • Member Since 2012/08/07


Statistics

Comments

  • Threads Started 123
  • Replies Posted 0
  • Likes Received 6
  • Abuse Flags 0
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More