Caption Contest Winner
We have a winner in our most recent caption contest! Check it out.
We hope you like this article!
Please help us grow by sharing:
Get Updates In Your Inbox
Free weekly emails, plus get access
to subscriber-only prizes.
We won't share your email. You can cancel at any time.
Comments (0)
Quantum physics is impossible to wrap one's mind around, and this kind of demonstration is not helping.
At that level of magnification, all you have is a probability of finding something. The electron will not follow a given path around the nucleus, it jumps around randomly.
The mental image we have of nucleus = planet and electron = moon is very unfitting.
Kids are taught the Rutherford atomic model early on, because it's easy to comprehend. A clear analogy to the earth and the moon can be drawn. But it's wrong.
Later, students learn other atomic models such as Bohr's, but they're just models. They can accurately describe what happens to a point, but they're not actually what's happening by a long shot.
What's actually going on is way more mind-boggling than "there's a lot of space in an atom."
No
"The mental image we have of nucleus = planet and electron = moon is very unfitting."
At this scale, you can only talk about a particle's wavelength, which is inversely proportional to its
mass. So, the electron should be huge, and the
nucleus small.
Hmm... there's an idea for another model...
Empty space within an atom is irrelevant.