<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>10 Most Influential Media Moguls in History</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/07/22/10-most-influential-media-moguls-in-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/07/22/10-most-influential-media-moguls-in-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Haney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media moguls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odd News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2011/07/22/10-most-influential-media-moguls-in-history/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the scandal unfolding in Britain we see just how powerful someone like Rupert Murdoch really is. However there have been many like him before as we see in this list of some of the most powerful media moguls in history. My favorite is Joseph Pulitzer (pictured).  You know you have power when you have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-49798" title="moguls" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/moguls-500x837.jpg" alt="" width="350" height="586" /></p>
<p>With the scandal unfolding in Britain we see just how powerful someone like Rupert Murdoch really is. However there have been many like him before as we see in this list of some of the most powerful media moguls in history. My favorite is Joseph Pulitzer (pictured).  You know you have power when you have facial hair like that.</p>
<blockquote><p>Since the dawn of mass media, newspapers, radio and television have all  been used to inform and educate the public. They have also been used to  whip mobs into a frenzy, control the world of politics and consolidate  their owners’ power. These media moguls all straddled the line between  entertainment and politics, preaching to the public and wielding an  immense influence over lawmakers and politicians.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.businesspundit.com/10-most-influential-media-moguls-in-history/" target="_self">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/07/22/10-most-influential-media-moguls-in-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Experiment&#8221;: Mom Unplugged Kids from Internet and Media</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/01/19/the-experiment-mom-unplugged-kids-from-internet-and-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/01/19/the-experiment-mom-unplugged-kids-from-internet-and-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baby & Kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets, Hacks & Mods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Maushart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unplugged]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2011/01/19/the-experiment-mom-unplugged-kids-from-internet-and-media/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens when you take away your teenagers' TV, iPods, cell phones, video games and even - gasp - Internet? Susan Maushart did that to her three kids for 6 months in what she called &#34;The Experiment&#34; and lived to tell about it. And something with as grand as &#34;The Experiment,&#34; you'd need to kick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2011-01/susan-maushart.jpg" width="150" height="99" class="imageleft">What 
        happens when you take away your teenagers' TV, iPods, cell phones, video 
        games and even - gasp - Internet?</p>
      <p>Susan Maushart did that to her three kids for 6 months in what she called 
        &quot;The Experiment&quot; and lived to tell about it. </p>
      <p>And something with as grand as &quot;The Experiment,&quot; you'd need 
        to kick it off in a grand way - which is exactly what Susan did:</p>
      <blockquote> 
        <p><em>She turned off the electricity completely for a few weeks &#8212; 
          candles instead of electric lights, no hot showers, food stored in a 
          cooler of ice. When blackout boot camp ended, Maushart hoped the &quot;electricity 
          is awesome!&quot; reaction would soften the kids' transition to life 
          without Google and cell phones.</em></p>
      </blockquote>
      <p>The result is surprisingly (or not surprisingly, for some people anyhow) 
        are good:</p>
      <blockquote> 
        <p>Her son Bill, a videogame and TV addict, filled his newfound spare 
          time playing saxophone. &quot;He swapped Grand Theft Auto for the Charlie 
          Parker songbook,&quot; Maushart wrote. Bill says The Experiment was 
          merely a &quot;trigger&quot; and he would have found his way back to 
          music eventually. Either way, he got so serious playing sax that when 
          the gadget ban ended, he sold his game console and is now studying music 
          in college.</p>
        <p> Maushart's eldest, Anni, was less wired and more bookish than the 
          others, so her transition in and out of The Experiment was the least 
          dramatic. Her friends thought the ban was &quot;cool.&quot; If she needed 
          computers for schoolwork, she went to the library. Even now, she swears 
          off Facebook from time to time, just for the heck of it.</p>
        <p>Maushart's youngest daughter, Sussy, had the hardest time going off 
          the grid. Maushart had decided to allow use of the Internet, TV and 
          other electronics outside the home, and Sussy immediately took that 
          option, taking her laptop and moving in with her dad &#8212; Maushart's 
          ex-husband &#8212; for six weeks. Even after she returned to Maushart's 
          home, she spent hours on a landline phone as a substitute for texts 
          and Facebook.</p>
        <p>But the electronic deprivation had an impact anyway: Sussy's grades 
          improved substantially. Maushart wrote that her kids &quot;awoke slowly 
          from the state of cognitus interruptus that had characterized many of 
          their waking hours to become more focused logical thinkers.&quot;</p>
        
      </blockquote>
      <p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110118/ap_on_hi_te/us_fea_parenting_teens_unplugged">Link</a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/01/19/the-experiment-mom-unplugged-kids-from-internet-and-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Britain Has Changed: 1997 to 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/10/how-britain-has-changed-1997-to-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/10/how-britain-has-changed-1997-to-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 21:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/10/how-britain-has-changed-1997-to-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How has Britain changed in the past 10 years? Prospect Magazine has an interesting infographic detailing the transformation of Great Britain from 1997 to 2009: Richer, fatter, living longer, more indebted, drunker, better connected, politically disillusioned: there&#8217;s no metric that can describe whether we are happier or living better lives after 13 years of Labour. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2010-07/britain-change-decade.jpg" width="500" height="403"></p>
<p>How has Britain changed in the past 10 years? Prospect Magazine has an interesting infographic detailing the transformation of Great Britain from 1997 to 2009:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Richer, fatter, living longer, more indebted, drunker, better connected, politically disillusioned: there&#8217;s no metric that can describe whether we are happier or living better lives after 13 years of Labour. But there are plenty to show how we have changed during a period of fulsome spending, borrowing and technological transformation;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>The snipped above is from the Media and Technology section and shows that cell phone ownership has gone from 17% to 93% of household, Internet access has grown from 4% to 73% whereas music sales have declined from nearly 10 million singles to just 4 million. Similiarly, newspaper circulation has contracted by 25%.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/how-britain-has-changed-since-1997/">Link</a> | <a href="http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/Feature_data.pdf">The infographic in PDF format</a> &#8211; via <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/93598/After-the-break-its-UK-1997-vs-UK-2009">metafilter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/10/how-britain-has-changed-1997-to-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photographer Graphs Her Images</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/02/04/photographer-graphs-her-images/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/02/04/photographer-graphs-her-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queuebot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts & Crafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2010/02/04/photographer-graphs-her-images/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photographer Nikki Graziano takes pictures and then creates graphs of mathematical functions which map nicely to elements of the image. It&#8217;s a very neat and beautiful way of combining math, nature, and art together into a single image. Most of us can’t tell our secant from our cotangent. But the forms are everywhere, and Nikki [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/misscellania/480mathart.jpg"></p>
<p>Photographer Nikki Graziano takes pictures and then creates graphs of mathematical functions which map nicely to elements of the image.  It&#8217;s a very neat and beautiful way of combining math, nature, and art together into a single image.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/01/pl_arts_found/"><p><em>Most of us can’t tell our secant from our cotangent. But the forms are everywhere, and Nikki Graziano wants to help us see them. Graziano, a math and photography student at Rochester Institute of Technology, overlays graphs and their corresponding equations onto her carefully composed photos. “I wanted to create something that could communicate how awesome math is, to everyone,” she says.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/01/pl_arts_found/">Link</a></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/upcoming">Upcoming <img src="http://static.neatorama.com/img7/NeatoQ.jpg" class="middle" align="absmiddle"/>ueue</a>, submitted by <img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/813ad0094eb01518b2ed3817a0cecaaf?s=16&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D16&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-16 photo' height='16' width='16'  class="middle" align="absmiddle"/> <span title="member since June 24th, 2009 @ 14:55:37" class="profilelink">thalin</span>.</p>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/02/04/photographer-graphs-her-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best Media Errors of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/27/the-best-media-errors-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/27/the-best-media-errors-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minnesotastan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything Else]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regret the Error is a blog that takes note of errors, corrections, and apologies in print and electronic media; each December the most notable incidents are compiled.  Here are some selections from 2009: In my column on August 22 I suggested that Sharon Osbourne was an unemployed, drugaddled, unfit mum with a litter of feral [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-28467" title="regret the error" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/regret-the-error-500x361.jpg" alt="regret the error" width="500" height="361" />Regret the Error</em> is a blog that takes note of errors, corrections, and apologies in print and electronic media; each December the most notable incidents are compiled.  Here are some selections from 2009:</p>
<blockquote><p>In my column on August 22 I suggested that Sharon Osbourne was an unemployed, drugaddled, unfit mum with a litter of feral kids. This was not intended to be taken literally. I fully accept she is none of these things and sincerely apologise to Sharon and her family for my unacceptable comments. Sorry Sharon…</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>In printed copies of Monday’s Daily Universe, due to a spelling error in a photo caption, the word “apostles” was replaced with a different word [apostates]. The Daily Universe apologizes to the Quorum of the Twelve and our readers for the error.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>This article was amended on Tuesday 20 January 2009. In our entry on Garrison Keillor’s Lake Wobegon Days, we referred to a Prairie Ho Companion; we meant a Prairie Home Companion. This has been corrected.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The original article provided the incorrect location of New York University’s new institution. It is in Abu Dhabi, not Abu Ghraib.</p></blockquote>
<p>Many more examples at the <a href="http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/12/16/crunks-2009-the-year-in-media-errors-and-corrections/">Link</a>, where there are sublinks to additional compilations from the past five years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/27/the-best-media-errors-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart Named Most Trusted In News</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/26/jon-stewart-names-most-trusted-name-in-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/26/jon-stewart-names-most-trusted-name-in-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Harness</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything Else]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jon stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odd News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walter cronkite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/26/jon-stewart-names-most-trusted-name-in-news/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that Walter Cronkite passed, Time decided to ask Americans who their most trusted newsperson was. The results were overwhelmingly in favor of Jon Stewart. It&#8217;s a sad statement that the most trusted name in news is actually a comedian. I&#8217;m not sure if it speaks badly about Americans in general or about the state [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/timepoll.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-25385" title="timepoll" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/timepoll-500x314.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="314" /></a></p>
<p>Now that Walter Cronkite passed, Time decided to ask Americans who their most trusted newsperson was. The results were overwhelmingly in favor of Jon Stewart.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sad statement that the most trusted name in news is actually a comedian. I&#8217;m not sure if it speaks badly about Americans in general or about the state of our news media.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timepolls.com/hppolls/archive/poll_results_417.html">Link</a> Via <a href="http://www.good.is/post/jon-stewart-our-most-trusted-newsman/">Good Magazine</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/26/jon-stewart-names-most-trusted-name-in-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;National&#8217; Sues &#8216;Naughty&#8217; American University</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/16/national-sues-naughty-american-university/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/16/national-sues-naughty-american-university/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Urbanist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the headline pretty much sums this one up -  disgruntled university is suing an adult content site for treading on their trademarks. Unfortunately for National American University, however, the similarities mostly end at the same-sounding names starting with the same letters. One of the more hilarious claims of the former of the two NAU&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-24651" title="nau" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nau.jpg" alt="" width="468" height="174" /></p>
<p>Well, the headline pretty much sums this one up -  disgruntled university is suing an adult content site for treading on their trademarks. Unfortunately for National American University, however, the similarities mostly end at the same-sounding names starting with the same letters. One of the more hilarious claims of the former of the two NAU&#8217;s is that students, faculty and others may begin confusing one for the other. When folks affiliated with a school begin to confuse their campus for a pornography production set, however, it might just mean something is missing from the curriculum.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/46456777.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUl">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/16/national-sues-naughty-american-university/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Political Campaign Television Ad Ever</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/29/first-political-campaign-television-ad-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/29/first-political-campaign-television-ad-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queuebot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/29/first-political-campaign-television-ad-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[YouTube - Link]1952 Dwight D. Eisenhower (R) v. Adlai E. Stevenson (D) This campaign was very unique. The two candidates used radio and television ads effectively and fought a long hard campaign . Ike or Eisenhower (R) was a war hero (Supreme Commander of Allied Forces WWII), so Stevenson was reluctant to attack him directly, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p><div class="center"><object width="410" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DF9PsMDjc8g&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&showsearch=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DF9PsMDjc8g&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&showsearch=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="410" height="344"></embed></object><br/>[YouTube - <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF9PsMDjc8g">Link</a>]</div><br/><strong>1952 Dwight D. Eisenhower (R) v. Adlai E. Stevenson (D)</strong><br />
<br />
This campaign was very unique. The two candidates used radio and
television ads effectively and fought a long hard campaign . Ike or Eisenhower
(R) was a war hero (Supreme Commander of Allied Forces WWII), so
Stevenson was reluctant to attack him directly, and the Republicans had
a difficult time attacking Stevenson because he had not been part of
the previous Democratic administrations. Eisenhower went out and
traveled over 33,000 miles during this campaign. <br />
<br />
The campaign's television ads were most effectively used by Eisenhower,
who used short ads to promote his popularity. In contrast, his opponent
Stevenson used 30 minute speeches as a way to capitalize on the
television market. <br />
<br />
<strong>Eisenhower's short ads:</strong><br />
<ul>
	<li>&nbsp;were substantially easier to
	remember</li>
	<li>more likely to be watched by viewers</li>
	<li>played more often. </li>
	<li>Political ads were defined by these first ads on television.</li>
</ul></p> - via <a href="http://dotellme.blogspot.com/2008/11/political-media_19.html">dotellme</a></p><p>From the <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/upcoming">Upcoming <span style="font-family:arial black,sans-serif;color:#900;font-size:1.75em;vertical-align:middle;border:0;text-decoration:none;">Q</span>ueue</a>, submitted by <span style="vertical-align:middle;"><img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/1e733f3891be50215cf266d7f189fc9e?s=16&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D16&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-16' height='16' width='16' /></span> <span title="member since January 29th, 2009 @ 10:10:31" class="profilelink">seth1492</span>.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/29/first-political-campaign-television-ad-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:50:05 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.2606 seconds -->
