<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; dole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/dole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Family Too Fat to Work Gets £22,000 a Year.</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/19/family-too-fat-to-work-gets-22000-a-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/19/family-too-fat-to-work-gets-22000-a-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queuebot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chawner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/19/family-too-fat-to-work-gets-22000-a-year/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And they want more! The Chawners, who haven&#8217;t worked in 11 years, explains why they want, nay, deserve more money! (Photo: Bernard Ashton/Closer) &#8220;What we get barely covers the bills and puts food on the table. It&#8217;s not our fault we can&#8217;t work. We deserve more.&#8221; The family claim to spend £50 a week on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="imageleft"><img src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/upcoming/thumbs/2009/03/18/Family-too-fat-to-work-gets-22000-a-year-m.jpg" alt=""/></div>
<p>And they want more! The Chawners, who haven&#8217;t worked in 11 years, explains why they want, nay, <em>deserve</em> more money! (Photo: Bernard Ashton/Closer)</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5004431/Family-who-are-too-fat-to-work-say-22000-worth-of-benefits-is-not-enough.html"><p><em>&#8220;What we get barely covers the bills and puts food on the table. It&#8217;s not our fault we can&#8217;t work. We deserve more.&#8221;</p>
<p>The family claim to spend £50 a week on food and consume 3,000 calories each a day. The recommended maximum intake is 2,000 for women and 2,500 for men. </p>
<p>&#8220;We have cereal for breakfast, bacon butties for lunch and microwave pies with mashed potato or chips for dinner,&#8221; Mrs Chawner told Closer magazine.</p>
<p>&#8220;All that healthy food, like fruit and veg, is too expensive. We&#8217;re fat because it&#8217;s in our genes. Our whole family is overweight,&#8221; she added.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5004431/Family-who-are-too-fat-to-work-say-22000-worth-of-benefits-is-not-enough.html">Link</a> &#8211; via <a href="http://tywkiwdbi.blogspot.com/">tywkiwdbi</a></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/upcoming">Upcoming <img src="http://static.neatorama.com/img7/NeatoQ.jpg" class="middle" align="absmiddle"/>ueue</a>, submitted by <img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/8d3b6042ebcf66522f4e34ac40f1feee?s=16&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D16&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-16' height='16' width='16'  class="middle" align="absmiddle"/> <span title="member since February 4th, 2009 @ 16:04:18" class="profilelink">philosophile</span>.</p>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/03/19/family-too-fat-to-work-gets-22000-a-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:30:36 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0699 seconds -->
