Which Countries Support Middle East Ceasefire?

By Alex in Politics, Weapons & War on Jul 22, 2006 at 12:12 am

Which countries back immediate ceasefire in the growing Middle East Crisis (some call it a war already) and which countries do not, asks the Belfast Telegraph. Here’s the answer: Link – via digg.

 


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Doug Hightower
    Jul 22nd, 2006 at 8:00 am

    Most of those countries in the yes side only have the firepower of the boy scouts. Most are just puppet countries influenced by others.

  2. Alex
    Jul 22nd, 2006 at 9:58 am

    You’re right, JD – the Belfast Telegraph reprinted it. Couldn’t find the original source on the Independent.

  3. cuerno
    Jul 22nd, 2006 at 7:30 pm

    Add the Texas flag to the no column.

  4. OS Perry
    Jul 22nd, 2006 at 11:03 pm

    If Israel was completely/magically disarmed tommorow of all its weapons, it would be complete obliterated from the map, in the coming days after. If Syria/Iran/Lebanon were completely/magically disarmed tommorow, the Mid-East would be a lot safer, and Israel wouldn’t strike a defenseless country, if they were totally disarmed.

    And if a renegade group of Cuba’s Military, started sending rockets and missles into Florida, you don’t think Americans would be throwing a fit for the US military to go in and stop the renegade military of Cuba?

    So Israel isn’t supposed to defend itself against militant extremist Muslims, wanting the total destruction of all Jews in Israel?

  5. Sancho Panza
    Jul 23rd, 2006 at 3:18 am

    This is the idea of Democracy that USA wants to impose around the world …

  6. jay vaughan
    Jul 23rd, 2006 at 4:09 am

    No Weapons == No War. Stop Weapon Profits == Peace.

  7. Aleki
    Jul 23rd, 2006 at 1:37 pm

    Amen perry!

    I like the Florida comparison. Sorry though Not having weapons does not lead to peace. There is a reason we study history. Tibet ring a bell? There are also a lot of weapons out there that don’t have bullets or explosions. I’ve been places where food and machetes are turned into weapons just as easily as a gun. History is wrought with the stronger always trying to destroy the weaker and I for one am proud of a nation that stands up for the rights of the weaker time and again. Before you start spewing your talking points from the commune, I’m aware that we also act in our own interests…. shock shock! Standing up for Israel is the right thing to do. They just want to be able to go to work and school without worrying about some fanatic blowing them up.

  8. Scott
    Jul 24th, 2006 at 8:25 am

    Right, and because of the cease-fire, radical Muslims will thereafter behave themselves, integrate into the world community, stop trying to blow up your infrastructure and nailing notes to your artists with knives. Wait a minute …

  9. Bobby
    Jul 24th, 2006 at 9:00 pm

    I don’t think Canada supports an immediate ceasefire – because the U.S. does not.

  10. Ted
    Jul 24th, 2006 at 9:26 pm

    I don’t believe Canada has really weighed in on the issue.
    I find this whole item a little offensive – it places blame on US, UK and Israel for something that was started by terrorists.

    They sure know how to play the game – stir up a bees nest, and then blame the bees.

  11. James
    Aug 5th, 2006 at 6:51 pm

    Wow, the child who made this up really makes his/her point! I wonder, does baby really think supporting terrorist swine is sticking it to the good old USA? Or is it something else? I mean, I do know you don’t I? You were so mad with Reagan standing up to the ‘Evil Empire’ and when the wall came down you were so destroyed inside, you had to find something, somewhere you could transfer you leftist hatred of America to. You were successful. I feel sorry for you.

  12. silly liberals
    Aug 15th, 2006 at 4:15 pm

    apparently the “artist” has never heard of a “conditional ceasefire”.

    maybe he should study geo-politics between bong hits. it appears most of these commentators are spot on if not at least close.

  13. pol x
    Apr 16th, 2007 at 4:48 pm

    I love how you Yanks get seriously gung ho at the drop of a hat.

    Someone saying that most people are against war, and out comethe crazies, pro war,suddenly everyone else is a faggot and and a puppet!

    Nope, other countries are just opposed to US policy, they are “thinking for themselves”.

    As for adding the texan flag, well if you guys were told that there were commies in your pants you’d shooot your own cocks off.

    War is not glamourous nor is it sexy, so please stop getting tumescent about the whole thing.

    So to recap, War not good, Peace better!

    ALl together now


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page