I think the author of this article is using a little bit of trickery to take jabs at men. She complains about masculinity and "entitlement" from the male fans of Fight Club. But she wouldn't write an article complaining about the masculinity and entitlement of Polar Bears, for example. Male Polar Bears do what they do because of determinism - not toxic masculinity or entitlement. Determinism doesn't care how you feel about it, whether it's male or female determinism. Also you can't argue that "rules are meant to be broken" is the only point of Fight Club. If that were the case, why are most of the characters in Fight Club male? Would the movie be exactly the same if it were 90% females? Also let's not forget that, no matter how many "rules you break", you never get away from rules and consequences. Everything in the universe is always following rules. If you remove the biology aspect of Fight Club (and it were just about breaking rules or the American Dream or "debt") it wouldn't be half as good of a movie. Biology is on a spectrum, and it matters. Biology is always "part of the point"."Men are naturally predisposed to being violent, dominant hunter gatherers, who, having found themselves domesticated by modern civilization, are now in a state of crisis.” I can tell you that, as a male, this is how men actually feel about the modern world. And it's a big part of what Fight Club is about. Many women have found the man they were looking for in life, and they are not bothered by their "masculinity" or "entitlement". As buddha said "life is suffering", and not everyone is blaming the opposite gender for everything .Creating simple theories (and attempting to umbrella everyone under it) is a dangerous game.