I miss my Maltese.

It looks like the Maine legislature had done its job very well indeed.

I have the California statutes at my fingertips, but you are correct. I should have dug for the Kansas statute. Here it is:

"8-2503: (a) Except as provided in K.S.A. 8-1344 and 8-1345, and amendments thereto, and in subsection (b) or (c), each front seat occupant of a passenger car manufactured with safety belts in compliance with federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 208, who is 18 years of age or older, shall have a safety belt properly fastened about such person's body at all times when the passenger car is in motion."

I call bullshit. "The Law" absolutely defines a seatbelt. The below is quoted from the California Seat Belt law.

"... a manual safety belt system that meets the performance standards applicable to automatic crash protection devices adopted by the United States Secretary of Transportation pursuant to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208 (49 C.F.R. 571.208) as in effect on January 1, 1985."

I use a siphon.

Now *this* is why I visit Neatorama. Thank-you.

Why is the printing at the end in English?

I am voting for Kyra Braswell.

To emphasize Ruben's point: It is almost impossible to cut completely through a one gallon bottle of water without dislodging its bottom. The marital artist does it multiple times and then show us that the bottles are not attached at the base. He cuts through one bottle and leaves one inches away untouched. He has a bit more trouble with the half gallon ones.

I think we used to call this Glee Club.

From what I was able to see of the mechanism, the resulting shave is impossible. I call bullshit. Note the camera moves away from the man being shaved for quite a while.

Or, you could look the interviewer in the eye, ask her what that question has to do with the job in question and while she is stammering out an answer, tell her to stop wasting your time and get serious.

The point of an interview is for both people to evaluate the potential business relationship. Who would want to work for that kind of person?

I, for one, welcome Serkan's information.

I look at it quite differently. This proves that the guy made the correct move by dumping her and she now has a permanent record of being a bitch.

Every time I get told to use a stronger password, I wonder who appointed them to be the password police? I know the risks of using "weak" passwords. Warn me and then let me be as foolish as I wish.