Justin 6's Comments
I'm having trouble finding what scholarly journal if any this study was published in. Does anyone know how I can find the raw data for this study?
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Hmmm, I'd like to know more specifics on how the test was conducted. Was the cell phone on, for how long, was it receiving phone calls constantly or at all? Was this done in a lab, or outdoors in an uncontrolled area. Also, how close was the cell phone to the bees' hives, could it have been the proximity to the hive, or maybe the color of the phone.
The article goes on to mention about the increasing evidence that cell phones are harmful to humans, but all the articles and studies I've seen have discounted this.
It's clear there is a problem here, but the solution seems unclear. I'm more inclined to think it could be some pesticide that is widely used, than cell phone radiation... Then again, I'm not a bee expert.
The article goes on to mention about the increasing evidence that cell phones are harmful to humans, but all the articles and studies I've seen have discounted this.
It's clear there is a problem here, but the solution seems unclear. I'm more inclined to think it could be some pesticide that is widely used, than cell phone radiation... Then again, I'm not a bee expert.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Hah, I read the article on the origins of Easter. It's priceless! I can't wait to see "Jesus and the Deciples" live! Come on armegedeon!
Oh and Jimbo, while I agree there is some bias in some articles, I think overall Wikipedia serves as a good source for general information on a subject. If you want to look something up quickly it is great and for the most part reliable.
I'm not saying you should write a research paper using it as your main source though.
Oh and Jimbo, while I agree there is some bias in some articles, I think overall Wikipedia serves as a good source for general information on a subject. If you want to look something up quickly it is great and for the most part reliable.
I'm not saying you should write a research paper using it as your main source though.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
OUCH! thats painful!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Damn, that's something I've only seen in movies.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
HAH!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Yeah I even saw a Coke bottle design casket.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
It's not my fault, The parasite made me do it!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
HOLY CRAP!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
The most uncomfortable bike seat ever!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
It looks like it's about to fall apart!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
GIT ER DONE!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Pretty cool, is that a compilation of many shots, or one shot? if so That's a lot of lightning at one time!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
The building isn't built yet, it's a design... So yeah it is photoshop (or w/e they used).
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
http://agbi.uni-landau.de/material_download/IAAS_2006.pdf
It seems to me that the study is so small(I think they only used 8 bee hives, and I think he says some of them weren't recorded correctly) that a new study should be done using realistic approaches. From what I understand, they took cordless phone base stations and pumped them to full blast and then put them right under or in the bee hive.
Anyways this study smells a little fishy to me, but I think another larger scale study should be done.