Shows just what kind of person I am that the most disturbing part of that story to me was the blatantly misused apostrophe in the lower third.

"... women who write on that subject are never taken seriously."

Hate to break it to you, but it has nothing to do with your gender.

"So the decade will not end until the end of this year (2010)."

http://theslot.blogspot.com/2010/01/happy-new-decade.html

"No way. The year IS number two thousand and ten, NOT twenty ten. Pronounce it as what it is."

Do you also say "year one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine"? I didn't think so.

Every hipster octopus knows to wear Doc Martins.

"But grammatically, 'twenty-ten' is thirty."

By that logic, "nineteen ninety-nine" (1999) would be 118.

Saying "twenty ten" makes sense, considering the traditional pronunciation of all past years. But, neither way is "correct."

Verb-adverb combinations replaced by nouns/adjectives always annoy me.

Log in =/= Login
Check out =/= Checkout
Back up =/= Backup

I'm not going to address whether or not this qualifies as art, but I'd like to say those who compare breaking a window to rape need to reevaluate a few things.

"Only works this year. Next year everything will be one year off."

Yes, but ... uh ... everyone will be one year older, so it works out.

It's a cigar wheel. Players could deposit a coin for a chance to win a cigar.

Word of no day whatsoever: everytime.

(OK, completely off-topic, but Justin01 just reminded me of this complete non-word I've been seeing more and more lately.)

Hey, we all wish we had sponsors, but hate when others get them instead.

Everyone else is doing it:

http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/22/junk-shop-photos/

"... a startlingly realistic future where psychics are used to predict murders ..."

Did this statement make anyone else laugh?

"Gee....Thanks To all the idiots for labeling this person a Hunter and thus invite the wrath of other Idiots who didn't read the article like JM above."

I read the article, and the article refers to him as a hunter more than once. The only reference to a target is in the first paragraph when the reporter is describing what I would assume was a demonstration for the interview.

"If it is a life and death situation why don't they just shove the offending vehicle out of the way with the fire truck. Why waste time looking for the owner??"

Why bother trying to comprehend the article when you can just spout off about the situation?