Well,'s Comments
Muhammed was a pig. Jesus was gay. Moses was a pedophile.
That is all.
That is all.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Simpson characters have more prominent upper lips. These characters don't look that Simpsonized...except for being yellow
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I realize 9/11 is still so fresh people are overly emotional in dismissing "conspiracy theories".
That is fine. My suggestion is to start with the Kennedy assasination and work your way up to present times. It will be easier to objectively look at alternate explanations for an older historical event than one that is still fresh.
There are very clear reasons for the Reichstag fire, the Gulf of Tonkin, the Kennedy assasination, and the 9/11 hoaxes. Be a student of history and view present day events through those lenses.
That is fine. My suggestion is to start with the Kennedy assasination and work your way up to present times. It will be easier to objectively look at alternate explanations for an older historical event than one that is still fresh.
There are very clear reasons for the Reichstag fire, the Gulf of Tonkin, the Kennedy assasination, and the 9/11 hoaxes. Be a student of history and view present day events through those lenses.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Wow, that link was terrible. This guy apparantly thinks that the well qualified people behind organizations like "Scholars for 9/11 truth" are too dumb to be aware of those "counterpoints". On the contrary, they are much more sophisticated and educated than him.
couple of major inaccuracies in the article:
The jet fuel burning would have only been a flash in the pan. Most of the actual "heat" would be generated from office supplies and building walls, etc, burning. No steady lamp of jet fuel to melt the steel. Even if there was, the design of the towers was so reinforced and redundant that at 50% strength it could support 3-4 times the weight that it did.
"A controlled demolition has evenly spaced charges, not sporadic ones randomly firing."
^
This quote shows the (lack of) research the author did. The squibs photographed ARE evenly spaced, and timed.
No doubt there are some nuts in the 9/11 truth movement, but its unfair to paint the whole movement based on the few nuts. No serious 9/11 truther thinks planes weren't used or all the jews were warned ahead of time etc...that is nuts.
I'm not going to rebut every single poorly articulated "counterpoint" in the article, but I suggest that those who are curious and have an open mind read Stephen Jones peer reviewed paper on the subject http://www.wtc7.net/articles/WhyIndeed09.pdf
Of course if you do not have an open mind to the possibility then by definition you won't put credence into any alternative viewpoint. But the author of that blog's argument relies on loaded thought terminating language like "conspiracy nuts", "this is just laughable", etc, without saying much anything of substance. His elementary layman rebuttals were the only thing laughable in that piece.
My personal conviction is that the towers were demolished after the planes hit. Any opinion beyond that is conjecture on my part, but there is plenty of real evidence for the demolition. I do not know what the motives were, they might have even been trying to save nearby infrastructure from being damaged from one of the tops of the towers falling over. Most theories are more sinister, but there are a range of possible motives that are not "nuts". Who knows what actually happened.
No doubt this comment box will devolve into a flamewar, in which I don't intend to participate. Have a good day everyone.
couple of major inaccuracies in the article:
The jet fuel burning would have only been a flash in the pan. Most of the actual "heat" would be generated from office supplies and building walls, etc, burning. No steady lamp of jet fuel to melt the steel. Even if there was, the design of the towers was so reinforced and redundant that at 50% strength it could support 3-4 times the weight that it did.
"A controlled demolition has evenly spaced charges, not sporadic ones randomly firing."
^
This quote shows the (lack of) research the author did. The squibs photographed ARE evenly spaced, and timed.
No doubt there are some nuts in the 9/11 truth movement, but its unfair to paint the whole movement based on the few nuts. No serious 9/11 truther thinks planes weren't used or all the jews were warned ahead of time etc...that is nuts.
I'm not going to rebut every single poorly articulated "counterpoint" in the article, but I suggest that those who are curious and have an open mind read Stephen Jones peer reviewed paper on the subject http://www.wtc7.net/articles/WhyIndeed09.pdf
Of course if you do not have an open mind to the possibility then by definition you won't put credence into any alternative viewpoint. But the author of that blog's argument relies on loaded thought terminating language like "conspiracy nuts", "this is just laughable", etc, without saying much anything of substance. His elementary layman rebuttals were the only thing laughable in that piece.
My personal conviction is that the towers were demolished after the planes hit. Any opinion beyond that is conjecture on my part, but there is plenty of real evidence for the demolition. I do not know what the motives were, they might have even been trying to save nearby infrastructure from being damaged from one of the tops of the towers falling over. Most theories are more sinister, but there are a range of possible motives that are not "nuts". Who knows what actually happened.
No doubt this comment box will devolve into a flamewar, in which I don't intend to participate. Have a good day everyone.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Neatorama has become a site of whiners.
WAHHHHH I don't think dats verwy neet!!! WAHHHHHH
Just shut up! pussies...
WAHHHHH I don't think dats verwy neet!!! WAHHHHHH
Just shut up! pussies...
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Alex Fear gets an EPIC FAIL for his sorry apologist attempts.
The truth is that Jesus was a gay man. Thats why Christians are such prudish pussies today. Their hero is George Bush.
Debate THAT.
The truth is that Jesus was a gay man. Thats why Christians are such prudish pussies today. Their hero is George Bush.
Debate THAT.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
"As a last note, if I were out having coffee with one of these guys and he copied down my debit card number, I’d bludgeon him unconcious and leave him in the alleys of deep New York city as to teach him a short-lived lesson about real chaos, anarchy, and pain."
U rawk!!!
U rawk!!!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Christians always ruin the fun. Self righteous fools.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Page 2 of 2
prev
And idiot adults.
"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen Roberts