@myrasam79. John may have written the article, but he didn't create the rings. It's not meant to be practical. A ring is a symbol. This one just goes a little further in its symbolism. It's a conceit, a joke. Obviously, it's not meant to be taken seriously.
What message are people handing to their spouses on their wedding days when they have cake toppers with the bride dragging the groom to the altar? Surely, they would know that you can't force someone to marry you just by dragging them to an altar. Oh - it's a joke. I get it.
Yes, you can be less fat than another pawn shop guy. Although if you're fat, can you be considered to be "eating that well"? Perhaps it should be "eating that much" - a case of quantity rather than quality.
No, it's not his right to have sex in the forest, especially if it's somehow private property or whatever. But I would think they'd have a sign posted saying no trespassing that would at least mention the fact that cameras are in use.
What message are people handing to their spouses on their wedding days when they have cake toppers with the bride dragging the groom to the altar? Surely, they would know that you can't force someone to marry you just by dragging them to an altar. Oh - it's a joke. I get it.
Sure it's silly and ineffective, but it's no more a waste of money than any other ring would be.
I love nitpicking.
Loved the "Crappy wheelchair" comment.
That's pretty gross, all the same. I wouldn't want to buy any food there.
Somehow I feel no sympathy for the person.