Nice little piece of work by the actress and videographer. I have to echo the consensus opinion, however. I love well done shorts, but to have all this technical expertise wasted on a non-story with a couple of unmotivated characters makes me lose motivation to watch more of them.

We get the post apocalyptic bunker from the visuals. The clipping montage should have placed the woman in the bunker and told us why she is there. Her movement from suicide to determination is unsupported. Bunker 15's ploy to get her co-ordinates is poorly considered. I'll just stop now.

The Yike is going to fail for the same reason as the Segway. It is too expensive.

Besides being the best Monty Python sketch, only "Who's on First" surpasses it on the all time list. (Well, my all time list, anyway.)

Is it wrong of me to laugh at how he sounded though the snow-muffled microphone?

You never know what you will do until something happens. No amount of planning or preparation will turn a natural coward into a hero. No disability will turn a natural hero into a coward.

Friggin' Brilliant!!!!

Neat idea, but 30 seconds of winding a clock work generator can produce almost as much electricity for an hour, I suspect that this will not be very popular.

Hasn't the Internet grown into a stunning adolescent? Did its creators imagined that an 1899 movie would be made available for education and entertainment. Thank-you for this.

Wonderful art.

Your resident cynic loves women in heels as much as the next guy. Maybe even more, so he will withhold judgement on this piece of art until he sees someone walk in it.

Game characters are well considered by their creators. Cataloging the distribution of ethnicity in real societies might be of interest. But since every game society is the result of intelligent design, wouldn't it generate more useful information if the researchers asked those creators why they made their choices?

I sense a new meme.

Neat on so many levels. Thank-you.

Am I the only one here that is worried that genetically altered fish are escaping from a "fish farm"?

Having taken (and actually passed) Physical Chemistry, I can assure everyone that all of the above comments are correct. An, of course, they all all incorrect to some degree. (Joke intended)

The great public debates of Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Einstein et al. about the applicability of subatomic theory to superatomic objects ranged from absurdity to theology. They did, however, lead to things such as semiconductors, nanotechnology and superconductivity. All of which prove that it is possible to build large objects that demonstrate subatomic properties.