That would violate the Church of Scientology's beliefs. The real memebers want to practice the beliefs in peace and try to make the world a better place. As do most religious people. Don't let sensationalized news pieces shape your opinion of a religion.
Hating Scientology is the new "anti-semitic" religious prejudice trend; all the cool kids are doing it. Scientologists don't do half the evil stuff people believe and quit giving them that much credit. The so called weird beliefs are from fables, story that are written to explain/teach morals. Have you read the material in the context its present in? If taken out of context communion is about drink blood for immortality. Trolls love setting them up and how they play the idiot public to believe scary "alt religion" did these bad things.
Secondly, Its a lowly troll not a hacker. Copy Pasta scripting doesn't equal a "hacker".
Maybe somebody can explain this to me, Anonymous is mad at CO$ for wanting their material off line. People rally around to take down the wiki and other pages under non-nobility and delete wars. Successfully removing the information and details about the beliefs. Which CO$'s own practices couldn't get removed. Then they attack and overload the CO$'s hosting servers causing them to crash. So Anon and CO$ seem to be working for the same goal. Keeping Scientology off-line and accessible only at their churches. What if Anonymous is really Ron Hubbard?
Hating Scientology is the new "anti-semitic" religious prejudice trend; all the cool kids are doing it. Scientologists don't do half the evil stuff people believe and quit giving them that much credit. The so called weird beliefs are from fables, story that are written to explain/teach morals. Have you read the material in the context its present in? If taken out of context communion is about drink blood for immortality. Trolls love setting them up and how they play the idiot public to believe scary "alt religion" did these bad things.
Secondly, Its a lowly troll not a hacker. Copy Pasta scripting doesn't equal a "hacker".
Maybe somebody can explain this to me, Anonymous is mad at CO$ for wanting their material off line. People rally around to take down the wiki and other pages under non-nobility and delete wars. Successfully removing the information and details about the beliefs. Which CO$'s own practices couldn't get removed. Then they attack and overload the CO$'s hosting servers causing them to crash. So Anon and CO$ seem to be working for the same goal. Keeping Scientology off-line and accessible only at their churches. What if Anonymous is really Ron Hubbard?