15 times Star Trek Altered the Timeline

In the Star Trek universe, the Prime Directive prohibits Starfleet personnel from interfering with the internal development of alien civilizations. They violate the directive over and over, but even worse, they interfere constantly with the space-time continuum. You can’t really blame the Enterprise crew, or even the writers, because time travel makes for wonderful stories. But it does mess up the continuity of several TV series and a dozen feature films. The Deep Space Nine episode “Trials And Tribble-Ations” even had the DS9 crew interacting with the characters in the 1960s series!

Plenty of Trek episodes dealt with time travel before DS9, but “Trials And Tribble-Ations” is the first to show characters traveling back to the events of a previous series; in a way, it serves as a prototype for the direction the new movie franchise would take, dipping in to the nostalgia of the original series while still maintaining its own voice. The plot here is largely an excuse to let the crew of DS9 interact with some of their “heroes,” as the episode uses footage from the classic original-series entry “The Trouble With Tribbles” intermixed with matching footage from the present. The effect is hugely entertaining, allowing the show to both mock and pay homage to the flaws and wonders of its predecessor. As a bonus, “Trials” also introduces the Department Of Temporal Investigations, a group dedicated to maintaining the internal logic of history. They mostly serve as a framing story, but the existence of the department is a helpful reminder that time travel and the shenanigans that result from it are an integral part of the franchise.  

The A.V. Club counts 14 other instances that time travel threw the Star Trek universe off-kilter. They always manage to “set things right” by the end, but who knows what changes they made in their timeline that the characters will never realize?   

(Image credit: Nick Wanserski)


Comments (0)

The snippet quoted above is flawed. There are probably thousands if not millions of people in Western civilization who would jump at the chance to take a one-way trip to Mars, either alone or en masse. The problem is that the over-achievers given preferential treatment by NASA and its ilk thrive on public recognition.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
If there was a program that provided a one way ticket to Mars (or anywhere else for that matter) and the necessary equipment to make an honest attempt at survival, I'd jump at it.

It would be nice to bed down beneath unknown stars just once in my life.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'm in. Sign me up. (I'm totally serious, but my wife may have veto power over that decision!)

It wasn't that long ago that missionaries en route to Africa or wherever would pack their belongings in a coffin, knowing their remains would either return in that same coffin or be buried where they died. Granted, their mission was a bit different than any would be Mars traveller, but the drive to pioneer is pretty strong, no matter the mission.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I wouldn't mind going if it was with folks I could stand living with, Hell, the best idea would be to send couples who could stand each other for long periods while doing scientific work and adding to the growth of the colony. Hell, if we could do that we could even drop off folks and supplies in a one way only method. I'd so volunteer to do this. Have my name go down in history for being among the first humans to colonize the surrounding planets.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The only roadblock to any type of Mars mission is MONEY.

Most (all) of the engineering and technology is already available for a two-way trip.

But if it had to be a one way trip, I volunteer Chaney or Bush or both (but preferably the destination should be Pluto just to be safe).
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
When JFK said let's put a man on the moon, we did it in 10 years. It used to be a dream on mine to walk on Mars. I figured out long ago it would never happen.

Let's put it this way: If the guys running NASA were in charge of the western expansion following the Louisiana Purchase, we'd still be on the east side of the Mississippi.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I think that as far as history goes, the disenfranchised who took the risks weren't doing it because they wanted to, it was the only option they had.

I've thought for years that I'd take that step and go to Mars, the moon or wherever given the chance.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
After watching Close Encounters of the Third Kind back in the day, my friends and I had many long and serious debates as to whether we would get on the UFO or not. We might end up learning the secrets of the universe. We might end up as pet food. No way to know. Split second decision.

We all pretty much decided we would go for it.

I'm a pretty solitary man. If I thought my sacrifice would pave the way for the future, I'd do it. Spend my last days in a nursing home or spend them seeing things no one has ever seen before? There is no question.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@ The Mutt

Oh, I agree whole-heartedly! I've also debated the finer points of being abducted would I go and see the Universe or would I scream like a maniac and make a mad dash for the exits. Also, being a pretty solitary guy I would also think I could use my life for better things like paving the road to Space. You put it quite eloquently! :)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
La eticidad de este acto pertenece exclusivamente a los lenguajes internos del individuo que se sienta capaz de realizar tal azaña. A nadie más. Estos lenguajes pueden orientarlo hacia una vía de escape de estas características y lograr un bien personal y un objetivo científico, entre otras cosas. Puede ser un gran salto para un individuo insertado en una humanidad desnaturalizada y en un mundo reencantado por nuestra imaginación colectiva. ¿Acaso nadie prefiere morir en su mundo antes que vivir padeciéndolo? Éste será un explorador y habitante potencial de nuevos mundos. Un "dasein" dentro de un nuevo concepto de "estar arrojado en el cosmos".
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
What the hell does a psychologist from Springfield Illinois know anyways? Has she seen all the homeless and displaced people around the US? What about all the Cultists who all want to get off this planet, such as the Christians? Why can't we send a whole pack of dumb Christians who all believe in this god being and send them packing with a whole load of Muslims and Latter Day Saint morons so they can argue as to who owns space?
In fact, if we sent all the religious freaks off this planet, the more peaceful this planet will be.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Commenting is closed.

We hope you like this article!
Please help us grow by sharing:

Get Updates In Your Inbox

Free weekly emails, plus get access
to subscriber-only prizes.

We won't share your email. You can cancel at any time.
Email This Post to a Friend
"15 times Star Trek Altered the Timeline"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
neat stories? Like us on Facebook!
Close: I already like you guys!