That 10,000 Hour "Rule" Doesn't Always Hold Up

They say that practice makes perfect. More recently, we've all heard that to become really good at something, you need to put in 10,000 hours of practice. Unless you spend all day practicing, that's a lot of years. So not only is the "rule" discouraging, it doesn't really make sense. Quite a few people are very good at something when they are still young, and others change directions completely at an advanced age and then show amazing talent. In this TED-Ed lesson, David Epstein explains that you don't have to devote yourself to a certain activity from childhood in order to become really good at it. Sometimes it takes a bit of experimenting to find out where your talents lie, or what your passion is. If you find something you are excited about doing, practice doesn't feel like work. And if you begin to feel at home with what you are doing, who is counting those hours? We can't all be world famous for our talents, but we can all be good at something.  


Newest 1
Newest 1 Comment

The 10,000 hour rule is .. a joke. It is someone trying to self help idiot style inspire by using a study on something else. It was self reported "how much did you practice" survey results to people who.. were already good enough to get into a violin academy. Wildly inaccurate. And the people who did the actual research agree. Sold a lot of books for a charlatan though
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Start New Comment Thread...

Commenting on Neatorama will earn you NeatoPoints!

Preview Comment
Start New Thread Post Your Reply

This reply comment will earn you 100 100 NeatoPoints !


 
Email This Post to a Friend
"That 10,000 Hour "Rule" Doesn't Always Hold Up"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More