How Living Arrangements have Changed in the US

Statistics_Data_Facts made a chart showing how living arrangements have changed over the past 55 years for Americans ages 25-34 years old. The data comes from the US Census Bureau. Lifestyles have changed for this age group considerably. The biggest difference from 1967 to 2021 is the decrease in the percentage of those people who live with their spouse. Sure, more people are living with a partner without getting married, which is the pink line, but not enough to explain the plunge. Another chart combines the two, and it still plunges. Other factors include the rising age of first marriage, which has been going on a long time, extended education (with long term loans), and an economy that makes marriage appear out of reach.     

There are other charts that break down the statistics even further by sex. The percentage of people living alone has remained fairly stable over time, but has alway been higher for young men than for young women. This is understandable, for reasons that have to do with both economics and safety. However, men have slightly overtaken women in living with parents or other relatives over time. You can see the full sets of charts at Statistics_Data_Facts. -via Digg


Comments (3)

Newest 3
Newest 3 Comments

Living with mom and dad rose 16% since 1967. I would have thought the percentage would have been much higher considering the Troll Factor is in full swing since the internet was created.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'm sure we could all name at least 10 reasons why the shift. Economy, multi-cultural confusion, increasing political divisions in every country, civil wars, pandemics, human overpopulation for no ones benefit other than rich people, economies always inflating and never deflating, etc. With such uncertain times, it makes sense the traditional structures are falling apart and changing to something else.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Ah, I wondered where Kanye West was. I see that rappers are on another grid.

And regarding the grid of writers: Ain't nobody more arrogant than Ayn Rand. Sorry.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"Kurt Kobain's placement looks about right." Well, his *spelling* looks about right, but his placement on the genius scale - at least relative to most of the other names on this list - is preposterous. I love his music, but come on.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
  2 replies
Neil Young will tell you that Jerry Garcia not only humbly took his place in American music, but that he did so with a vision and expertise that places him firmly in the genius level. And I will tell you that stopping to measure the genius of Axl Rose is like measuring the bounce of a flat tire.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Prince is way too low on the Arrogance meter. Here we have a guy who took on the Big Label (Warner Music) and officially changed his name to a symbol just to get out of a contract. In Stipe's case (REM), he sold out by signing an 80 million contract with Warners…I don't think Prince and Stipe should be even near each other; they belong in different quadrants (or universe)!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"How Living Arrangements have Changed in the US"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More