As NASA is currently in the process of colonizing the Moon by 2024 and Mars in the 2030’s, is it really a good idea to do so?
Yea, there are hazards on the Moon and Mars worth considering:
The Moon — extreme radiations; extreme cold and hot temperatures and micrometeorites the size of sand grains that travel at 10 miles per second.
Mars — radiation, toxic soils, cold temperatures and low amounts of water. But, despite these hazards, NASA can, hopefully, figure out a way to live on these astronomical bodies through extensive studies over the course of many hard fought years.
We’ve spent excessive amounts of money to explore the Moon and Mars, dating back to at least 1969 when Apollo 11 was the first crewed mission to land on the Moon. The Apollo program cost over $25 billion dollars. And it costs about $6 billion to bring four people to Mars. The concern here is that If NASA and the Pentagon know that aliens exist — with their advanced UFO technology and advanced civilization on other planets — then why haven’t they considered the fact that Aliens haven’t colonized the Moon or Mars?
Hm... Logic... If they are there, they are on the surface, or at least leave traces on the surface, as in the case of molehills... Just check earth creaturs that prefer borders such as coasts, rivers, wooldland edges over other more uniform habitats... From an alien life form's point of view it would be easiest to colonialize the most habitable planet accessible... In case it can be assumed that life easieset develop on an earth type planet with athmosphere and liquid water... the most suitable planet in the solar system would simply be this planet "dirt" or "earth"... Assuming that the aliens that may colonialize earth or moon come form outside the solar system.... they would surely select earth as primary target, alone when considering necessaryy rocket trunk size, as you just have to take less "stuff for surviving" with you. ... From a conquerer's point of view it would be much easier to wipe out a few of these humans in a nearly non-habitated area to establish an airhead (space head) to wipe out these earthlings by appropriately designed biological weapons, than to geoform a planet as mars or this moon-thing... It is also much simpler to land on a planet with an athmospehre than on one with nearly no gaseous encapsulation. Keep it simple when searching for aliens... .. search in habitable zones, not in "cool" areas such as asteroid belts for mynocks or space slugs and such star warts crap ....
If they are there, they are on the surface, or at least leave traces on the surface, as in the case of molehills... Just check earth creaturs that prefer borders such as coasts, rivers, wooldland edges over other more uniform habitats...
From an alien life form's point of view it would be easiest to colonialize the most habitable planet accessible... In case it can be assumed that life easieset develop on an earth type planet with athmosphere and liquid water... the most suitable planet in the solar system would simply be this planet "dirt" or "earth"...
Assuming that the aliens that may colonialize earth or moon come form outside the solar system.... they would surely select earth as primary target, alone when considering necessaryy rocket trunk size, as you just have to take less "stuff for surviving" with you. ... From a conquerer's point of view it would be much easier to wipe out a few of these humans in a nearly non-habitated area to establish an airhead (space head) to wipe out these earthlings by appropriately designed biological weapons, than to geoform a planet as mars or this moon-thing...
It is also much simpler to land on a planet with an athmospehre than on one with nearly no gaseous encapsulation.
Keep it simple when searching for aliens... .. search in habitable zones, not in "cool" areas such as asteroid belts for mynocks or space slugs and such star warts crap ....