Submit your own Neatorama post and vote for others' posts to earn NeatoPoints that you can redeem for T-shirts, hoodies and more over at the NeatoShop!


The New, Nicer Nero

The popular view of Roman Emperor Nero is that of Peter Ustinov’s performance in Quo Vadis. People who know nothing else of Nero know that he fiddled while Rome burned. While that might be true, it doesn't tell the entire story. We think of Nero as a cruel sociopathic tyrant because of the stories that followed him all these centuries. Most of them are quite embellished, if not totally made up.

But what if Nero wasn’t such a monster? What if he didn’t invent the spectator sport of throwing Christians to the lions in the Colosseum? What if he wasn’t the tyrant who murdered upstanding Roman senators and debauched their wives? Indeed, what if the whole lurid rap sheet has been an elaborate set-up, with Nero as history’s patsy? After all, we have no eyewitness testimony from Nero’s reign. Any contemporaneous writings have been lost. The ancient Roman sources we do have date from considerably after Nero’s suicide in A.D. 68. The case against Nero, then, is largely hearsay, amplified and distorted over two millennia in history’s longest game of telephone. Besides, no one really wants to straighten out the record. Who wants another version of Nero? He’s the perfect evil tyrant just the way he is.

John Drinkwater is the author of a new Nero biography, in which the Roman emperor appears to be a run-of-the-mill ruler, a young man who preferred to write poetry and sing than deal with politics. He did have his mother killed, but the story of Nero obliviously letting Rome burn was nonsense. Nero was no angel, but neither was he the despot he's been portrayed to be. Read what the historians say about Emperor Nero at Smithsonian.

Newest 5
Newest 5 Comments

The Idea that the author has discarded Suetonius and Plutarch as sources ensures that this is revisionist nonsense and unworthy encomium. File under pointless fiction?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
...unless it was another meaning of the word (or translatable to) "fiddle" and cleaned up through intentional abstruse interpretation by upright (Victorian/American overly puritan perhaps?) scholars?.. that meaning is very, very old indeed...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Hrmm.. I'm not quite sure "read a biography of a run of the mill emperor" is a particularly good way to sell a book. Mind you perhaps that's part of what's wrong with the world and publishing/journalism in general? We only want to read about interesting things (which good and stable governance isn't particularly)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
what revelations will future biographers discover about POTUS trump? Maybe he'll be a misunderstood stable genius after all!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.

Email This Post to a Friend
"The New, Nicer Nero"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.


Success! Your email has been sent!

close window

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
Learn More