Raised in a Doomsday Cult

In the mid-1960s, Anne Hamilton-Byrne established a religious cult called The Family in Melbourne, Australia. Their beliefs mixed Christianity with Eastern mysticism, and held that Hamilton-Byrne was an incarnation of Jesus Christ. She collected children, both by sketchy adoption practices and by appropriating the children of her followers. Ben Shenton was one of those children. He was told that Hamilton-Byrne was his mother, and she controlled the children by beatings, drugs, and an ingrained suspicion of outsiders. In 1987, police executed a raid and took the children into custody.   

Lying in bed that first night away from Lake Eildon, Ben combed through everything he had said that day, making sure he had divulged nothing that could get him in trouble. Suddenly, he realised - it didn't matter any more. He was not returning to Anne. "I think for the first time in my life, I realised I was free," he says.

But then the real work began.

Ben learned that his mother was not Anne, but an "auntie" he disliked named Joy. The children were not his brothers and sisters - some were the children of other cult members, others were orphans Anne had adopted. He was 15, not 14 as he had been told. And of course Anne was not the reincarnation of Christ.

"Now I'm trying to work out, 'Well, this world I'm in, what are its rules? How do I function, what do I do?'" he says.

Ben Shenton tells of his struggle to adjust to living with people he'd been taught to avoid, and how he worked out his relationships with his biological mother and with Hamilton-Byrne, at BBC News.  -via Digg

(Image source: Ben Shenton)


Comments (0)

Language and grammar evolve and I think deep down he's mostly upset that what he is right about now, he may be wrong about in decades to come as the rules of the English language adapt. I'm surprised he's not upset we don't speak Old English anymore.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I don't think he's particularly upset about anything, it's very tongue-in-cheek.

That said, mashing words together is part of almost every language in the world, and many Germanic languages are pretty much built on the concept. Romance languages like Spanish, when spoken in real life, also have tons of dropped syllables and are darn near unintelligible to listen to if all you know is what you learned in a high school text book.

That is how all languages evolve over time. The dictionary is supposed to change. However, lolspeak and lazy sms methods don't belong. :P
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Damaging my Grammar Geek cred a bit here is the fact that I *just* got Miss Cellania's name. I got it. Only took me six months of Neatoposts. I'm awesome.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I agree with Dev. This guy is obviously an English major type and not a Linguistics major type or he'd understand that differences register, dialect, elison, internal and external sandhi, etc. do not amount to incorrectness.

However, bad grammar is bad grammar and should be exterminated.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Amidala - that's right. With "or" you go with the number of the subject closest to the verb - so "child" is singular and takes "does" as a singular verb. IE -

- My mom or my dad does the dishes.

- My sister or my parents do the dishes.

I should really be grading my students' grammar hw instead of doing this.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"Don't feed bad (or badly), SethH. A lot of people I know took years to recognize that it's a joke."

Oh wow, I just realized it was a pun and I've been coming here for years!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Actually, saying "things we say wrong" is wrong, or more appropriately, incorrect. I do believe that it should be: "things we say incorrectly".

But I'm sure that's part of the joke.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
My pet peeve is when people say "orientate". What? What the hell is that? A Chinese potato?

When you are lost, you orient yourself. That way you become oriented. Yes, you can go through orientation, but afterward you are not "orientated". (shakes head in disgust)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
in a related pet peeve...i can't stand when an adult corrects another adults grammar. unless you are (truly) doing it because you care about the person and want to prevent them from an embarassing situation in, say, a business meeting or social settings. it seems to me that the majority of 'grammar correctors' seem to be doing so to show their knowledge - rather than to (truly) help the other person out. so if everyone could please stop doing that, i'd be much obliged.

ps, hopefully it goes without saying that i don't care to have my grammar errors scrutinized, analyzed and publicized. thank you.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I don't mind how the language evolves, like how "cool" also means "great", but I can't stand lazy language. My mother used to drive me nuts with "Want to go with?"

If we're so darned civilized and special, can't we at least take the time out for a complete sentence and proper spelling? Since I've begun losing my hearing I've gotten even less patient with the spoken language.

At least any mistakes I make are legitimate errors and not willful ignorance and laziness.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 0 comments
Email This Post to a Friend
"Raised in a Doomsday Cult"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More