No One Has Solved the Voynich Manuscript Yet

Nobody knows what the Voynich Manuscript says or why it was written in the first place. It includes various illustrations of plants, animals, other symbols, and an as of yet unknown writing system. Many people tried to crack the code but none have been successful. So why are people so obsessed with saying they've solved it?

While it is the mystery of the Voynich that appeals, that grabs and holds the attention of a curious public, undercooked solutions presented without context lead readers down a rabbit hole of misinformation, conspiracy theories and the thoroughly unproductive fetishization of a fictional medieval past, turning an authentic and fascinating medieval manuscript into a caricature of itself.

Basically, we want to recreate the medieval world through our imagination and embed such meanings and connections onto the text where there is none. We want to try and convince ourselves that our ideas about the Voynich are what it is invariably trying to say because we want that fantasy to be true.

When we approach an ancient object such as the Voynich Manuscript, we tend to bring our preconceptions with us to the table. The more we burden the manuscript with what we want it to be, the more buried the truth becomes.
>The missteps of historical preconception are particularly problematic when dealing with the Middle Ages. We watch “Game of Thrones,” we read “Lord of the Rings,” we play medieval-themed video games, and therefore we think we know something about the Middle Ages.

But as it stands, nobody has solved the Voynich Manuscript. And we might not be able to do so if we continue to concoct theories that aren't based on solid evidence.

(Image credit: Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library/Wikimedia Commons)

Newest 2
Newest 2 Comments

No. That was yet another false lead. Was a weird twist stating that it was a form of old Turkish, yet written more phonetically (or something along those lines). There has since been two other major claims of it being cracked. One through AI, one concluding it's a derelict Mediterranean language.. meh, simpler to quote:
"The manuscript is written in proto-Romance - ancestral to today's Romance languages including Portuguese, Spanish, French, Italian, Romanian, Catalan and Galician. The language used was ubiquitous in the Mediterranean during the Medieval period, but it was seldom written in official or important documents because Latin was the language of royalty, church and government. As a result, proto-Romance was lost from the record, until now."
The Old Turkish schizzle... really just media picking up a story en masse and running with a fractional truth as a complete one: "It's solved!"
Nope. Not really.
They do claim that they have 30% of the manuscript deciphered.. but apparently peer reviews and other scholars have since claimed that what they've 'completed' makes absolutely no sense linguistically.
Who knows! The only thing that is 100% certain is that there currently is not a 'deciphering' that is anywhere even close to being unanimously accepted as being correct. So still a mystery, yet even false paths should help.
All that said, it certainly does look very much like an Almanac, and a majority of the plants depicted within have been identified and seem to all share remedial qualities
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.

Email This Post to a Friend
"No One Has Solved the Voynich Manuscript Yet"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.


Success! Your email has been sent!

close window

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
Learn More