Groupthink Among Researchers Could Be Holding Back Innovation

Researchers nowadays have greater chances to collaborate and share their studies with one another as modern technology and connected networks gives them access to their peers' work. And that has caused the proliferation of more research at a much quicker pace. However, this can also be having the side effect of slowing down innovation in various fields.

Our connected world has allowed researchers to become so tightly networked that they’re falling into the trap of groupthink. That might explain why some researchers seeking cures for Alzheimer’s disease, for example, have conceded that they’ve been throwing years of work and billions of dollars toward a single theory that has failed to lead to any treatment –while ignoring promising alternatives.
Sociologist James Evans of the University of Chicago has concluded that what’s being lost, at least in biomedical research, is scientific independence. Being able to work independently of other labs allows researchers to come up with fresher insights.

Though it is true that a lack of scientific independence could be causing us to produce less original or innovative work, we cannot deny that openness and collaboration with other researchers also help in sparking ideas and giving insights that they need for their respective studies.

Scientists are subject to the same human foibles, but groupthink shouldn’t be conflated with scientific consensus, which is often based on ideas that are backed up by multiple lines of inquiry.
That would include things like the structure of DNA, Einstein’s theory of relativity, and the basic physics behind the greenhouse effect. Those are widely accepted now, in part because they were supported by independent, even isolated researchers.

(Image credit: Lucas Vasques/Unsplash)

Newest 4
Newest 4 Comments

From Stephen Mitchell's translation of Tao Te Ching:Chapter 11 We join spokes together in a wheel, but it is the center hole that makes the wagon move. We shape clay into a pot, but it is the emptiness inside that holds whatever we want. We hammer wood for a house, but it is the inner space that makes it livable. We work with being, but non-being is what we use. 
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Yes and No. Without groupthink there is no group. But without individuals branching off, you've got no innovation.The arguments of "group vs individual" are invalid. "We use plastic to make a cup, but it's the emptiness inside that we use"
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.

Email This Post to a Friend
"Groupthink Among Researchers Could Be Holding Back Innovation"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.


Success! Your email has been sent!

close window

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
Learn More