The shoes that Judy Garland wore in The Wizard of Oz are on display at the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History. They are covered with red sequins, with bows covered in red glass and beads. But after 80 years, the color has faded, and the sequins are brittle. Earlier this year, the museum raised $300,000 online to fund a careful cleaning and the construction of a special display case that will protect them from light damage. The shoes at the Smithsonian don't even come from the same pair -they are different sizes! That's because MGM had several pairs made for the movie production. In 1970, MGM cleared out its warehouse, and sent costume worker Kent Warner to salvage one pair for posterity.
On a dusty shelf, he found what he was looking for—a collection of ruby slippers that Judy Garland wore for her portrayal of Dorothy Gale for the filming of the 1939 Wizard of Oz. These were the famous shoes that only needed to be tapped three times and that touched so many hearts with their magical theme—“There’s no place like home.”
There were several sets of ruby slippers on the shelf, plus a curly-toed test pair. Warner had been told to destroy all but one. The single remaining pair were to be offered for sale at the seminal multi-day MGM Studios auction, where 350,000 costumes were to be sold, including the loin cloth worn by Johnny Weissmuller in Tarzan and Gene Kelly’s sailor hat from the 1949 film On the Town.
Warner picked out a pair of ruby slippers for the sale. But on the sly, he stuffed the others in a bag and walked them off the lot.
So what happened to the other slippers? Find out in an article at Smithsonian.
Comments (0)
On an unrelated note, the comment panel says I'm logged in as "Edward" though my profile page shows the correct log-in. It's too early for April Fool's so...
Chill out!
Thank you for the laugh Caldwell!
@Gauldar - don't take it seriously either, or they win.
Over all I have to agree that Firefox is the top choice if you only use the add ons that make it safer. I also use Chrome at times. Won't touch IE with a ten foot mouse.
I have 5 add-ons running, Adblock, Downloadhelper, Xmarks and a couple of others all of which vastly add to FF's usability.
tl;dr The cartoonist has no real idea what he's talking about
IE should be a very old mule, it'll get the job done most of the time just don't expect it to be flashy or quick.
Safari should be a lesser looking bike covered in bling.
They may not be religions, but they sure seem like political parties.
The new Opera is delicious, I'm falling for it.
Firefox: takes minutes to start so I don't use it unless I need one of the firefox only fabulous add-ons.
IE 6: Good Old timer, opened the door to what we see today in internet, you must respect your elder.
IE 7: still faster at startime than firefox, IE 8 just lazy work, like vista.
IE 9: I have my hopes up with this one.
Safari: it's OK just like chrome, but chrome is doing a lot better with -webkit, and getting over it.
Cartoon was fun.
Humor fell flat. Please try again.
It's not meant to be a comprehensive comparison, just a caricature of their common features and perceptions.
Have to say though, chrome's speed might be over exaggerated, even for a caricature. Especially since safari is a bicycle. They're almost an exact speed match, since they both use webkit.
:D