Escalator Etiquette vs. Escalator Efficiency

The London Underground moves millions of passengers every day, and the numbers keep growing. Anything that can make the system more efficient is worth a look. But flouting convention on escalators makes those passengers see red. See, the convention in London (and most US cities) is that you stand still on the right side of an escalator, and leave the left side open for those who want to walk up or down. An official from Transport for London (TfL) went to Hong Kong and noticed that MTR passengers on escalators didn’t walk -they just stood shoulder to shoulder and rode the stairs. Calculations showed that this behavior led to more carrying capacity for the escalators as a whole, and increased safety. They arranged a trial at Holborn station, in which TfL employees asked passengers to stand on both sides of the escalators. Other commuters were outraged.  

We might be bad at dancing and expressing our feelings, but say this for the British: when we settle on a convention of public order, we bloody well stick to it. We wait in line. We leave the last biscuit. And when we take the escalator, we stand on the right. The left is reserved for people in a hurry. In Washington DC, those who block the way are known as “escalumps”; here, they can expect the public humiliation of a tutting sound just over their shoulder. “Passengers just don’t like having these things changed,” says Celia Harrison, a Transport for London (TfL) customer strategy analyst, and one of the key people responsible for this heretical deviation from the norm. “I’ve worked on stations for many years. So I was aware that whatever we did people weren’t going to be comfortable about having their routine disturbed.”

The results of the trial were as expected: the carrying capacity of the escalators was increased, producing more efficiency for the system. But the backlash was so severe that officials admit that even if and when the system is introduce to other locations, they will have to reserve at least one escalator for those who prefer to walk. People just don't like change. -via Metafilter

(Image credit: Flickr user Ben Leto)

How should we use an escalator in a crowded subway system?






Of course this is more efficient to the system as a whole, but it is much less efficient to those who normally walk. It's those that normally walk who prefer the efficiency most, so of course they won't want to change. This reminds me of the study that shows lane merging is most efficient when the merging lane remains full, and the cars alternate merging in a "zipper"-like fashion. It's more efficient to the system as a whole, but people care more for themselves than for the system.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
  2 replies
After an escalator reaches capacity, then this method should be used. It's inefficient to use this method when the escalator is not full. Of course people got angry.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 9 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"Escalator Etiquette vs. Escalator Efficiency"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More