The Worst Parade to Ever Hit the Streets of Boston

In Boston in 1774, tensions were building up that would lead to the Revolutionary War. The colonies were chafing under British rule, and the British were exerting their authority by clamping down on rebellious communities. This was the atmosphere in which John Malcom, a bad-tempered loyalist customs official, was found yelling at a young boy in the street. One thing led to another, and Malcolm hit a townsman in the head. Later that night, a mob gathered to give Malcolm what for.

After a stop at a nearby wharf to pick up a barrel of tar (at some point, down-filled pillows, perhaps taken from Malcom’s own house, were also collected), the crowd, which now numbered more than a thousand people, hauled Malcom through the snowy streets to the center of town, where after three “Huzzas,” they loaded him into a cart parked in front of the Customs House. Almost four years before, this had been the site of the Boston Massacre, and as a consequence the building was now referred to as Butchers’ Hall. Bonfires were common in this portion of King Street, a 60-foot-wide plaza-like space in front of the Town Hall paved with seashells and gravel where the stocks and whipping post were also located. One of these fires may have been used to heat the stiff and sludgy pine tar (a distillation of the bituminous substance that bubbled from a smoldering pine tree) into a pourable black paste.

It was one of the bitterest evenings of the year. Boston Harbor had frozen over two nights before. Malcom was undoubtedly trembling with cold and fear, but this did not prevent the crowd from tearing off his clothes (dislocating his arm in the process) and daubing his skin with steaming tar that would have effectively parboiled his flesh. Once the feathers had been added, Malcom was clothed in what was known at the time as a “modern jacket”: a painful and mortifying announcement to the world that he had sinned against the collective mores of the community. Tarring and feathering went back centuries to the time of the crusades; it was also applied to the effigies used during Pope Night; several Boston loyalists before him had been tarred and feathered, but none could claim the level of suffering that Malcom was about to endure.

The story of John Malcolm's torture at Smithsonian also describes the political background of the incident, and the mob mentality that eventually was harnessed as a tool for the Revolution. Link

(Image credit: The Granger Collection, NYC)


Comments (3)

Newest 3
Newest 3 Comments

The linked article is a fascinating read. Smithsonian has long been a favorite of mine!
The last paragraph makes me shudder, though:
"On January 12, 1775, he attended the levee at St. James’s, where he knelt before King George III and handed his majesty a petition. What Malcom wanted more than anything else, he informed the king, was to return to Boston and resume his duties as a customs official—but not as just any customs official. He wanted to be made “a single Knight of the Tar…for I like the smell of it.”"
He must have been a bit off his rocker....
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Mind you, even from the so called historians who call the titanic the worst maritime disaster in history, what about sinking of the the ship Wilhelm Gustloff with 9400 people dead, the Estonia in 1994 with 852 lives,
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@ezpzvi:

If you actually knew how science works, you'd realize that to scientists who actually spend their entire lives studying their respective fields, the word "theory" does not mean opinion, as you seem to imply. In fact, a good scientist rarely ever uses the word "fact," because the best that we humans can do is make conclusions based on observations, but rarely can we ever say that something is an absolute "fact."

To a scientist, the word "theory" refers to a PROVEN concept backed by evidence and repeated observation. There is absolutely NO evidence or repeated observation to back up creationism. None whatsoever.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I watched a documentary about the Italian cruise ship, and the people on board were expressing how they felt at the time it was happening. They felt like they were in the movie "The Titanic". They were relating to the movie obviously, but I wondered why they didn't just say they felt like they were on the Titanic. It occurred to me that maybe they didn't know the Titanic was real, but I dismissed that idea - who could be that ignorant?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Gellner:

The people who don't vote have the right idea, though not necessarily for their reasons. Voting is irrelevant because of, inter alia:
(a) institutionalized vote fraud,
(b) our problems being commercial in nature, thus being unsolvable via political means--apples vs. oranges,
(c) the foolishness of looking to politicians for solutions to problems we the people are creating,
(d) the citizenship requirement for being eligible to vote, U.S. citizenship being an inferior status, and
(e) etc., etc., etc.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Fae:

These people don't vote.

You know young people don't exactly have good turnouts to vote, and honestly, do you think an idiot who thought the Titanic was fiction is going to be interested or even AWARE that politics are happening?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
lulu wrote:
The same type of ignorance that believes in creationism and waves off evolution.

For heaven's sake, can you restrain yourself from bashing people's beliefs for one minute?

You can't compare the two at all. Titanic = fact. Creationism/evolution = theories. Not knowing about an incredibly well-known shipwreck does not equate to believing/disbelieving a theory.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I remember watching the movie in the theater when it first came out and there were some teenagers surprised that the ship actually sank. I couldn't believe that they didn't know.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I remember, back in college, going to see the movie Titanic. A girl with me was furious at the screenwriters for revealing at the beginning of the movie that the ship sank.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I know what you mean,ShyWarrior. I've worked with people who cannot grasp the concept that we didn't have cell phones and the internet in the eighties. I listened to records as a child, and did not own CD's until the mid nineties. It still pains me to hear people thought the Titanic was only in a movie. Where did these people grow up?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I went back to College and met some young people who didn't believe me when I told them that there was no internet in my high school when I was there (Class of '92) and didn't know when World War 2 had occured (One of them said "In the 70s, whith the hippies in China")

Since then nothing can surprise me.

Humanity is doomed.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"The Worst Parade to Ever Hit the Streets of Boston"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More