Submit your own Neatorama post and vote for others' posts to earn NeatoPoints that you can redeem for T-shirts, hoodies and more over at the NeatoShop!

Larry, Curly and GMO

Get it? Well, GMO or Genetically Modified Organism - is on the news again, thanks to California's Proposition 37, which is on the ballot for the November 2012 election. The proposition makes labeling for genetically engineered food mandatory.

Is GMO bad? Dan Piraro of Bizarro Comic thought so when he created the cartoon above (GMO Moe? Love it!) but changed his mind after a flurry of comments by his blog readers:

A couple of days ago I posted about GMO foods and how dangerous they are. Thanks to several comments by readers, I did more thorough research and completely changed my mind.

I encourage you to read some or all of the articles I included at the end of this post and see if you come to the same conclusion. Here’s what I learned in a nutshell:

1. The process by which plants are genetically modified in labs is not substantially different than the way foods have been genetically modified by nature, selective breeding, or hybridization for millenniums. But in a laboratory, far fewer genes are altered and the outcome is far more predictable. Virtually all the foods we eat (including “organic” ones) have been genetically modified for centuries, but in a much more random fashion than we are able to do intentionally in a laboratory. If those did not produce toxic food that led to the destruction of the human race, it is even less likely that intentionally modified plants will.

2. Many of these lab efforts have been to specifically make a food grow better in harsh soil or weather conditions, include more vitamins, and/or be more resistant to insects. That means less pesticide use by farmers and that’s a good thing. That results in a plant that is 99.999999% the same as what you’ve been eating, it just no longer includes genes that make it wilt in the hot sun or taste good to aphids. Does that sound like it will give you a crab claw like Moe?


I’m not embarrassed that I was wrong and had to change my story. That’s the best thing about being an open-minded, reason-based person instead of, say, a politician; you don’t stick to erroneous beliefs in the face of new evidence for fear that people will think you are fallible. If everyone lived this way, the world would be much less ignorant, as I am today thanks to information given to me by some of my Jazz Pickles. Thanks!

The debate rages on (you can view the arguments from both sides on the web easily. Here's one for labeling GMO food by Mark Bittman over at The New York Times' The Opinion Pages and here's the counter-argument from Steve Savage over at Science 2.0) but what I love about Dan's post is how he started out having a preconception about something but changed his mind after learning more about the subject.

Dan's posts over at Bizarro Comic: Mutation Butts, Schooled! and GMO-A-GOGO

Newest 3
Newest 3 Comments

Money is indeed the profit motive for a great majority of companies, Monsanto included. But that in itself, shoudl that be enough to disqualify GMO as inherently bad?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.

Email This Post to a Friend
"Larry, Curly and GMO"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.


Success! Your email has been sent!

close window

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
Learn More