Drafting Like a Boss

Alex

Watch how this daredevil (helmet? what's that?) bicyclist goes 55 mph by drafting behind a truck. He'd better pray the truck doesn't brake all of the sudden: Hit play or go to Link [YouTube] - via Stuff I Stole from the Internet


Comments (5)

Newest 5
Newest 5 Comments

Is it possible for an 18-wheeler to "brake all of the sudden"?

What Is the Stopping Distance of Tractor Trailers?
http://www.ehow.com/facts_5796132_stopping-distance-tractor-trailers_.html
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Back when I was young and stupid. I did this sort of thing with the whole bike racing team every once in a while. We mostly did it to freak people out seeing a line of 6-8 bikes go flying by you on the highway has a tendency to make them look. You can even draft cars. Which is a little safer since you can see whats ahead of the car.
Chances are the truck driver didn't even know the guy was behind him. They can't see most cars behind them let alone a bike rider.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Jimbo the stopping distance is irrelevant. At that distance it's your reaction time that matters. If the truck's brakelights come on at that distance you've hit it before you could even squeeze the brake lever.

I recall some idiot trying to draught the bus I was on a few years ago. He probably wasn't even as close as this guy, the bus driver didn't even brake hard and the cyclist hit the back of the bus. Now he didn't hit it hard, but hard enough to take him down. Whereupon he slid under the rear of the bus. He lost a fair amount of skin, was battered and bruised and received minor burns from the exhaust, but he was lucky. Sliding under the back of a stopping bus is probably preferable to being run over by the following car.

And of course you should always remember that if you can't see the driver of the truck, he can't see you. So he won't be making any allowances for you.

Then there's the other problem with draughting too close. You can't see what the guy in front can see. I recall riding along once at speed when I swerved to miss a serious pothole, only to hear a clattering and swearing behind. A rider of whom I was completely unaware had been slipstreaming me and had hit the pothole good and hard. He lost skin and teeth. And all to take a little effort out of riding.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The story behind the name is a tad creepy:

"It is mostly known in the folk culture as kis gömböc, a round creature in the loft that remained from a killed pig, which swallows everyone one after the other who goes to see what happened to the previous ones"
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Or what about Daruma Dolls, a centuries-old Chinese toy that rights itself no matter how you tilt it? In fact its the reference for a popular Chinese proverb about picking yourself up after a fall (metaphorically). Just doesn't seem very impressive, unless I'm missing something here.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Yeah, what about an egg? I was thinking the same thing. A thing shaped like an egg also rights itself up, no complicated math, no mail-order needed...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
An egg doesn't right itself - it doesn't always end up resting on the same point no matter what orientation it starts in. You can see this yourself. Put an egg on the counter. Wait until it stops moving. Pick it up and mark the point it was resting on. Put it back down on another point. It won't end up resting on the same point, unless it has an air bubble that isn't along the axis of symmetry, in which case the object's density makes it self righting - which is what the challenge stated: "three-dimensional thingy that purely by dint of its /geometry/ had only one possible way to balance upright."
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The point is that Weebles and Daruma Dolls rely on *varying density* to accomplish the feat. They have a center of gravity that is very low on account of a weighted or hollowed out section. This widget does it WITHOUT that -- it's got uniform density and the action is accomplished purely through external geometry.

I can't see how by any stretch of the imagination an egg rights itself -- the egg just rolls over on its side and can from that point roll around all over the place. If you plotted the locus of possible points the egg could rest on, you'd get a circle, not a single point.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
A sphere would right itself, wouldn't it? You can't exactly determine which point is the top and which is the bottom. Well, you could, but it would be open to interpretation...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"Drafting Like a Boss"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More