Is it reasonable to assume that kids are going to use the Internet as a source of information? I used an encyclopedia, the local library, and textbooks when I was young. I didn't learn to cite references until University. But I knew what plagiarism was.
I think someone saw this student was trying to get the answer without doing any work, and pretended to be the teacher, just to be funny. Just like someone who would deliberately give a wrong answer. That's why you can't trust your sources.
@clinton robert labombard "The mere idea that anyone is required to source every piece of information they communicate is ludicrous and you are full of crap."
Did I say that everyone had to reference every piece of information they communicate? No, but in a written assignment for an educational institution, they should reference all arguments they did not come up with independently.
You don't even have to directly quote someone without citing them for it to be plagiarism. Technically while it's more difficult to police, even using somebody else's ideas or argument without citing them is also plagiarism.
Realistically I think asking somebody for hints and ideas is acceptable, but asking someone to find the answer for you and then pretending that you came up with it on your own, at least by university standards is plagiarism.
Actually, if the person is directly quoting the answer and not citing it, it's plagiarism. Since this kid thought that they could get the answer out of someone else and not do the work, my guess is that they would also just cut and paste whatever answers appeared and turn it in as their own work. That IS plagiarism.
"It would be plagiarism if somebody gave them the answer and they didn't reference them as a source."
If we were required to reference the source of every piece of information we gave first we'd all be guilty of life-long carriers of plagiarism and afterward we'd never get anything done. The mere idea that anyone is required to source every piece of information they communicate is ludicrous and you are full of crap.
I have to say I'm with Jennifer on this one - they all say change, Ron Paul's the only one whose policies sound like they'll DO anything to bring it about. I did see him for about half a second in there, I think.
I'll be voting for him when my state comes around.
Gotta love how everything turns into a vote for this person or vote for that person. I live in Iowa, so I guess I'm just sick of all the politicians. Great video though, I guess it's the season for change.
Funny how Change is always the cry of the politicians, but when they get in, only the right-wingers actually seem to do anything - even the wrong things are something.
Hillary's hubbie had two terms already to make his changes - did he actually advance on the promises he made? I think he set the cause of women's rights back into the 50's.
Comments (10)
I think someone saw this student was trying to get the answer without doing any work, and pretended to be the teacher, just to be funny. Just like someone who would deliberately give a wrong answer. That's why you can't trust your sources.
"The mere idea that anyone is required to source every piece of information they communicate is ludicrous and you are full of crap."
Did I say that everyone had to reference every piece of information they communicate? No, but in a written assignment for an educational institution, they should reference all arguments they did not come up with independently.
You don't even have to directly quote someone without citing them for it to be plagiarism. Technically while it's more difficult to police, even using somebody else's ideas or argument without citing them is also plagiarism.
Realistically I think asking somebody for hints and ideas is acceptable, but asking someone to find the answer for you and then pretending that you came up with it on your own, at least by university standards is plagiarism.
If we were required to reference the source of every piece of information we gave first we'd all be guilty of life-long carriers of plagiarism and afterward we'd never get anything done. The mere idea that anyone is required to source every piece of information they communicate is ludicrous and you are full of crap.
I may give the asker a push in the right direction though.
I'll be voting for him when my state comes around.
Hillary's hubbie had two terms already to make his changes - did he actually advance on the promises he made? I think he set the cause of women's rights back into the 50's.
How were women's rights any fewer in 2000 than they were in 1992?
How about making all of his supporters suddenly support sexual harassment in the workplace?