A New Look at the Pyramids

A new set of tombs have been found near the great pyramids of Egypt, belonging to the workers who built the pyramids 4,000 years ago. The discovery points away from the idea that the monuments were built by slaves. Instead, Egyptologists now believe they were paid professionals, according to Zahi Hawass, the head of Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities.
"These tombs were built beside the king's pyramid, which indicates that these people were not by any means slaves," said Hawass in the statement. "If they were slaves, they would not have been able to build their tombs beside their king's."

Evidence from the site, Hawass said, indicates that the approximately 10,000 laborers working on the pyramids ate 21 cattle and 23 sheep sent to them daily from farms in northern and southern Egypt.

Link -via Geeks Are Sexy

Comments (11)

Newest 5
Newest 5 Comments

The idea that the pyramids were not built by slaves is not at all new to Egyptology... pretty sure I heard about this 10 years ago. Folks got food, beer, and housing to work on massive projects like this for 3-month periods. As far as labor goes it probably wasn't any harder than farming anyway.

That was how most levels of priesthood worked too; basically a sweet temporary government job.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"21 cattle and 23 sheep fed 10,000 people? Are you F(*&*(& kidding me? Maybe that would be true if they also ate 2 thousand chickens along with that."

Meat was only a small part of their diet which was principally grain-based (i.e. bread & beer).
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I thought this was settled a long time ago when they found evidence of where the workers lived in large encampments, complete with all their garbage. I thought the consensus was that the pyramids were built by farmers as a way of paying taxes; you work on the pyramid for a couple of years, then you go back to your farm.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'm currently on a medically-supervised fast to lose weight, and in a few months I'm going to need to learn to live with a diet that is far lower in carbs than what I've enjoyed in the past. So I'm looking at this and thinking... protein pasta? I don't care if it's crickets, sign me up!

But then I look at their nutritional information and find that while it does contain almost twice as much protein as regular pasta, the carb count is practically the same. What's more notable is that it contains 30 times the sodium! Wow. Takes a lot of salt to make cricket palatable, I guess.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
  2 replies
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"A New Look at the Pyramids"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More