Evolution Without Genes

Most explanations of Darwinian evolution refer to genetic material as the manner in which changes are passed down to one's descendants. Now, a study by Jiali Li of the Scripps Institute in Florida finds that prions, the proteins that cause diseases like mad cow disease evolve in response to their environment. Prions have no genes, no chromosomes, and no DNA or RNA at all!
Prions are rogue version of a protein called PrP. Like all proteins, they are made up of chains of amino acids that fold into a complex three-dimensional structure. Prions are versions of PrP that have folded incorrectly and this misfolded form, called PrPSc, is social, evangelical and murderous. It converts normal prion proteins into a likeness of its abnormal self, and it rapidly gathers together in large clumps that damage and kill surrounding tissues.

Li has found that variation can creep into populations of initially identical prions. Their amino acid sequence stays the same but their already abnormal structures become increasingly twisted. These "mutant" forms have varying degrees of success in different environments. Some do well in brain tissue; others thrive in other types of cell. In each case, natural selection culls the least successful ones. The survivors pass on their structure to the "next generation", by altering the folds of normal prion proteins.

Scientists are not ready to classify prions as living things, even though this discovery may lead to some refinements in the definition of life. Link

Newest 5
Newest 5 Comments

actually this is rubbish.
Prions can not exist without genes.
To say a prion does not have DNA or genes is exactly the same as saying a brick does not have a house. It makes no sense.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The basics behind this are simple and awesome. If a change in an organism (or any reproducing thing) happens, there are three outcomes that matter to this line of thinking. The change can contribute to the ability of the resulting thing to be able to reproduce, the change can negatively affect the thing's ability to reproduce or the chance can have no (or close to no) measurable effect on the thing's reproductive success.

As these things live in a world where reproduction is not guaranteed, over time, changes will either help the population of things get larger as they reproduce better, lessen the population as the things reproduce poorly, or have no effect as the reproductive rate doesn't change.

Now, as things live in a world with finite resources and things eat other things, over time, a population of things will either die out, stay the same size or increase.

Noting this, it stands to reason that in most cases, evolutionary changes that hinder an individual's ability to reproduce, will die out in a population of things unless that change reoccurs often enough.

This means that successful mutations promote themselves by default, because unsuccessful ones die out through the lower reproductive potential they impart onto their owners. What survives are the individuals with changes that do not affect their "reproductive potential". But what thrives (over time) in the population are the changes that help the critters reproduce better.

It's a remarkably simple concept that plays out amazingly over generations in population biology and also maps over into other disciplines.

Happy New Year.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.

Email This Post to a Friend
"Evolution Without Genes"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.


Success! Your email has been sent!

close window

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
Learn More